UT Repository >
117 経済学研究科・経済学部 >
70 日本経済国際共同センター >
Discussion Paper F series (in English) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|タイトル: ||Evaluating Macroeconomic Forecasts : A Review of Some Recent Developments|
|著者: ||Franses, Philip Hans|
|キーワード: ||Macroeconomic forecasts|
JEL Classifications: C22, C51, C52, C53, E27, E37.
|Issue Date: ||Mar-2010|
|抄録: ||Macroeconomic forecasts are frequently produced, published, discussed and used. The formal evaluation of such forecasts has a long research history. Recently, a new angle to the evaluation of forecasts has been addressed, and in this review we analyse some recent developments from that perspective. The literature on forecast evaluation predominantly assumes that macroeconomic forecasts are generated from econometric models. In practice, however, most macroeconomic forecasts, such as those from the IMF, World Bank, OECD, Federal Reserve Board, Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and the ECB, are based on econometric model forecasts as well as on human intuition. This seemingly inevitable combination renders most of these forecasts biased and, as such, their evaluation becomes non-standard. In this review, we consider the evaluation of two forecasts in which: (i) the two forecasts are generated from two distinct econometric models; (ii) one forecast is generated from an econometric model and the other is obtained as a combination of a model, the other forecast, and intuition; and (iii) the two forecasts are generated from two distinct combinations of different models and intuition. It is shown that alternative tools are needed to compare and evaluate the forecasts in each of these three situations. These alternative techniques are illustrated by comparing the forecasts from the Federal Reserve Board and the FOMC on inflation, unemployment and real GDP growth.|
|Appears in Collections:||061 ディスカッションペーパー|
Discussion Paper F series (in English)
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.