UTokyo Repository 東京大学

UTokyo Repository >
119 教育学研究科・教育学部 >
東京大学大学院教育学研究科紀要 >

このページ(論文)をリンクする場合は次のURLを使用してください: http://hdl.handle.net/2261/51352

タイトル: 意味の理解は説明可能か? : ダメットの意味理論にもとづいたウィトゲンシュタインの規則遵守問題の批判を通じて
その他のタイトル: Is Understanding of Meaning Explicable? : Through a Critique of Wittgenstein's Rule-Following Problem Based on Dummett's Theory of Meaning
著者: 佐藤, 祐一
著者(別言語): Sato, Yuichi
発行日: 2012年3月10日
出版者: 東京大学大学院教育学研究科
掲載誌情報: 東京大学大学院教育学研究科紀要. 51巻, 2012.3, pp. 351-362
抄録: The whole discussion presents a critique of Wittgenstein's rule-following problem based on Dummett's theory of meaning in educational relevance. Despite the admission that meaning is use and the emphasis of ostensive training in language acquisition, Wittgenstein and Dummett elaborated decisively irreconcilable arguments over explicability of meaning. Repudiation of Frege's realism and obliteration of systematic accounts of verbal practices in Wittgenstein identify themselves with the exegesis that a blind correspondence of an act is the only criterion for rule-following. Contrastingly Dummett, contending that this assumption embodies constant danger of incommunicability, formalises, on grounds of Frege's distinction among sense, reference, and force, a theory of meaning which reasonably clarifies our knowledge in understanding a sentence. It is conjectured that Dummett's proclamation that a theory of sense, the mode of representation of understanding, can not only be shown but also be stated infers that a harmonious transformation between these two states arises in the process of conservative expansion; namely a sense firstly presented in an ostensive manner becomes constitutive of effectively decidable statements instrumental both in systematic refinement of our learning and in a grasp of another newly shown. Nonetheless, the question of how this transformation practically manifests itself, largely depending on subject matters, still remains unsolved, which has to be meticulously scrutinised in diverse curriculum studies. A concluding remark also notifies that "philosophy of thought" proposed by Dummett, which should elucidate in what a grasp of meaning expressed by language consists, must be established as a philosophical basis of education.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2261/51352
ISSN: 13421050


ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット
edu_51_29.pdf1.69 MBAdobe PDF見る/開く



Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - ご意見をお寄せください