UTokyo Repository 東京大学

UTokyo Repository >
132 東洋文化研究所 >
東洋文化研究所紀要 >

このページ(論文)をリンクする場合は次のURLを使用してください: http://hdl.handle.net/2261/72192

タイトル: 小部の成立を再考する : 説一切有部との比較研究
その他のタイトル: Rethinking the Composition of the Khuddakanikāya : A Comparative Study with Sarvāstivāda Parallels
著者: 馬場, 紀寿
著者(別言語): Baba, Norihisa
発行日: 2017年3月
出版者: 東京大学東洋文化研究所
掲載誌情報: 東洋文化研究所紀要. 第171冊, 2017.03, pp. 304-348
抄録: The ar ticle discusses how the Khuddakanikāya became a par t of the Pāli Tipiṭaka. In my book, Jōzabu Bukkyō no shisō keisei (Formation of Theravāda Buddhist Thought), I note that the Khuddakanikāya does not appear as a collection of suttantas in the four parts of the Pāli commentaries (Aṭṭhakathā) which refer to structure of the Pāli Tipiṭaka. Based on this assessment, I concluded that the Khuddakanikāya was the last collection added to the Pāli Tipiṭaka. In an article published in 2016, the scholar Toshifumi Shimizu critiqued my conclusion, insisting that the four parts of Pāli commentaries, which my book dealt with, do, in fact, mention the Khuddakanikāya. Reassessing these Pāli commentaries, I argue that Shimizu’s hypothesis is not valid because it is based on cer tain misunderstandings of Pāli words, and their context, and, on account of more general flaws in the logic informing his critique.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2261/72192
ISSN: 05638089


ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット
ioc171007.pdf916.08 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く



Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - ご意見をお寄せください