WEKO3
アイテム
教育委員会制度はなぜ「安定」したのか : 新制度論アプローチによる首長・議会の合理的選択仮説
https://doi.org/10.15083/00031867
https://doi.org/10.15083/00031867f7459d10-f29c-44b4-ad44-a8bd5d1f0ce8
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
eac022008.pdf (53.7 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2010-08-02 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 教育委員会制度はなぜ「安定」したのか : 新制度論アプローチによる首長・議会の合理的選択仮説 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00031867 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Why Has the Eeducation Board System Stabilized ? : The Hypothesis of Rational Choice of the Governor, the Mayor and the Local Assembly by the New Institutionalism | |||||
| 著者 |
村上, 祐介
× 村上, 祐介 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 70605 | |||||
| 姓名 | MURAKAMI, Yusuke | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | 東京大学大学院教育学研究科生涯教育計画コース・教育行政学研究室 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This study is intended to present theoretical hypothesis why the education board system has stabilized. The most commonly accepted view is that the intention of the Ministry of Education, because it is able to control the board of education. This opinion also said that the governor, the mayor and the local assembly could not concern about education. This viewpoint, however, cannot explain why they had power when the law concerning the organization and functions of local educational administration was enacted. To solve this problem, this article presents this hypothesis ; the reason why the education board system has stabilized is the rational choice of the governor, the mayor and the local assembly. The hypothesis uses the theory of transaction cost approach and path dependence. Transaction costs consists of four costs, legislative decision-making costs, commit problem, agency costs, the cost of uncertainty. The governor and the mayor and the local assembly, act to minimize the sum of transaction costs. Under the circumstance of the politics of education in Japan by the middle of 1990's, they chose to exist the education board system, which was independent of general administration. They delegate educational administration to the education board and didn't commit by themselves. In addition, path dependence makes more difficult to change the system. However, they have insisted on disuse of the education board system since a few years ago. This is because the environment, cold war and the conflict of the Ministry of Education versus the Japan teachers’ union, has changed. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
東京大学大学院教育学研究科教育行政学研究室紀要 巻 22, p. 86-95, 発行日 2003-03 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 13421980 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10565636 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 370 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学大学院教育学研究科教育行政学研究室 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| Educational Administration Course, Graduate School of Education, University of Tokyo | ||||||
