WEKO3
アイテム
宗教学史叙述とは何か : 〈ティーレ宗教学〉の宗教史的文脈を手掛かりに
https://doi.org/10.15083/00047678
https://doi.org/10.15083/00047678236100da-981a-45e6-82f2-e2d096b110f6
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
rel034002.pdf (334.9 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-09-12 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 宗教学史叙述とは何か : 〈ティーレ宗教学〉の宗教史的文脈を手掛かりに | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00047678 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | What Can/Should It Be To Write a History of Religious Studies? : A Reconsideration On the Basis of Religio-historical Contexts of C. P. Tiele’s Godsdienstwetenschap | |||||
| 著者 |
久保田, 浩
× 久保田, 浩 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 142921 | |||||
| 姓名 | KUBOTA, Hiroshi | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | 立教大学 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | At present – when Religious Studies has already been established as an independent discipline in the academic system – to write its history belongs to one of conventional and introductory ways to depict how its theories and methods have been elaborated. Thereby, it seems that a certain type of discourse has been dominant since 1970’s: a “scientific” study of religions was supposedly urged and fostered by its two “fathers,” Friedrich Max Müller, and Cornelis Petrus Tiele, in the second half of the 19th century, while a theological shift was made from the beginning of the 20th century on by so-called phenomenologists of religion, culminating in G. van der Leeuw’s Religionsphänomenologie. In this paper, an attempt will be made to give an impetus to reconsider such a popularized and standardized historiography in terms of the historical development of the discipline, by exemplarily re-examining C. P. Tiele’s design about godsdienstwetenschap, illustrating that it appeared in the midst of controversies on the future course of the higher education system (i.e. a status of theology), and also in the context of emerging Liberal Protestantism (modernisme) in the Netherlands in the second half of the 19th century, so that it will become clear that Tiele’s godsdienstwetenschap can be regarded as a product – neither a by-product nor a spin-off – of Liberal Protestant religiosity, as was also the case with F. M. Müller’s Science of Religion. Although Tiele’s Liberal-Protestant theology stood in close connection with his Remonstrant background, the strong stress on the “scientific” character of his godsdienstwetenschap rather resulted directly from both the historical and critical methods of Liberal Theology, and his Liberal Protestant inclination to see the ideal and perfect manifestation of “religion” per se just in the Liberal Protestant form of Christianity, which was considered a persuasive conclusion based on theological, i.e. “scientific” researches. By examining the involvement of this liberal-theological framework of thinking in Tiele’s concept of godsdienstwetenschap, especially in his understanding on the relationship between godsdienstwetenschap and dogmatics, this paper aims to relativize the popular historiography maintaining the “scientific” origins of Religious Studies, and accordingly to reconsider the religio-historical contextuality of its early days. | |||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 論文/Articles | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
東京大学宗教学年報 = ANNUAL REVIEW OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES 巻 34, p. 25-43, 発行日 2017-03-31 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02896400 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10032645 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学文学部宗教学研究室 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo | ||||||
