ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 118 総合文化研究科・教養学部
  2. 97 グローバルコミュニケーション研究センター
  3. Eruditi : The CGCS Journal of Language Research and Education
  4. 3
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. Eruditi : The CGCS Journal of Language Research and Education
  4. 3

Influence of L1 and L2 on L3 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Ambiguity Resolution in First, Second, and Third Language Processing

http://hdl.handle.net/2261/00077268
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/00077268
261a87ca-eff3-4851-b7ec-cda826e03809
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
Eruditi_03_01.pdf Eruditi_03_01.pdf (468.3 kB)
license.icon
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-08-15
タイトル
タイトル Influence of L1 and L2 on L3 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Ambiguity Resolution in First, Second, and Third Language Processing
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 parsing strategy
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 syntactic ambiguity resolution
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 prenominal relative clauses
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 second language learners
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 Bai, Chunhua

× Bai, Chunhua

WEKO 156065

Bai, Chunhua

Search repository
著者所属
著者所属 The University of Tokyo
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This study provides a set of cross-linguistic data on the resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguity by Japanese (JNS), Chinese (CNS), and Mongolian native speakers (MNS) in their respective languages using a set of cross-translated sentences. We compared the processing biases of Chinese and Mongolian second language (L2) speakers of Japanese (CJ and MJ) and Mongolian-Chinese third language (L3) Japanese learners, whose first language (L1) is Mongolian and L2 is Chinese, with those of L1 speakers of the three languages. The results for the three L1 groups (JNS, MNS, and CNS) showed that JNS and MNS have a high-attachment preference, while CNS were found to have a low-attachment preference. The results for the L2 group showed that MJ prefer high attachment, but not as strongly as JNS, and CJ prefer low attachment, but not as strongly as CNS. These results indicate the influence of L1 on L2 preference. The results for the L3 group indicate the influence of processing biases from both L1 and L2 on L3 sentence processing. This L3 group showed a high-attachment preference, but JNS and MJ both have statistically significantly stronger high-attachment preferences than L3, which indicates the influence of L2. While there is still a significant difference between the CJ and L3 groups, the L3 group prefer high attachment, which indicates the influence of their L1. We further discuss the relationship between the similarity of sentence processing bias and the influence of the language that learners already know.
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Section 1: Original Research
書誌情報 Eruditi : The CGCS Journal of Language Research and Education

巻 3, p. 1-13, 発行日 2019-07
権利
権利情報 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
出版者
出版者 Center for Global Communication Strategies, College of Arts & Sciences, The University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 13:17:44.739951
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3