ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 118 総合文化研究科・教養学部
  2. 97 グローバルコミュニケーション研究センター
  3. Eruditi : The CGCS Journal of Language Research and Education
  4. 3
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. Eruditi : The CGCS Journal of Language Research and Education
  4. 3

外国語学習者の動機づけの測定方法 : 英語とロシア語、「必修科目」と「選択科目」の比較

http://hdl.handle.net/2261/00077271
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/00077271
e5397cc0-e036-4949-a731-2d57e5617cab
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
Eruditi_03_04.pdf Eruditi_03_04.pdf (915.1 kB)
license.icon
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-08-15
タイトル
タイトル 外国語学習者の動機づけの測定方法 : 英語とロシア語、「必修科目」と「選択科目」の比較
言語 ja
言語
言語 jpn
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 motivation
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 comparative approach
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Russian learning
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 compulsory and elective subjects
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル A Quantitative Comparison of Japanese Learners’ Motivation to Learn English as a First Foreign Language and Russian as a First or a Second Foreign Language
著者 ムヒナ, ヴァルヴァラ

× ムヒナ, ヴァルヴァラ

WEKO 156069

ムヒナ, ヴァルヴァラ

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 156070
姓名 Mukhina, Varvara
著者所属
著者所属 Sophia University
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This paper examines the importance of measuring learners’ motivation to learn foreign languages and investigates the relevant diagnostic methods. Previous studies (Miyamoto et al. 2014) have applied expectancy-value theory to examine the specific characteristics of the motivation of learners of English as a first foreign language (EFFL) and Russian as a second foreign language (RSFL). Miyamoto et al. have indicated that the RSFL learners had lower ‘utility’ scores and higher scores in terms of time and effort ‘costs’ compared to the EFFL learners. Based on the findings, it appears that expectancy-value theory has great potential for use in the examination and comparison of the motivation levels of different groups of learners. However, the data collected were analysed to compare the group of learners studying English as a first foreign language (EFFL, a compulsory subject) and those pursuing RSFL (an elective or compulsory-elective subject, meaning that learners have to chose a prescribed number of subjects from a set group of subjects). Thus, the form of education—compulsory versus elective—may also influence these differences in motivation.
The author of this study employed the framework of Miyamoto et al. and compared their results with the motivation of the learners of Russian as a first foreign language (RFFL), a compulsory subject. A questionnaire survey was distributed to 69 first-year students and 60 second-year students at the Russian Department of Sophia University to collect the original data for this study.
The results of the study revealed that the motivation of RSFL and RFFL learners is still higher than that of EFFL learners. The fact that English is obligatory for all learners, regardless of whether they want to study it or not, may help explain this finding. On the other hand, despite some limitations, learners of Russian have a greater degree of freedom to choose Russian or some other language as an elective or even as a compulsory subject. However, this research also uncovered a difference in the motivation of RSFL and RFFL students, suggesting that distinct strategies should be employed to improve the motivation of learners of Russian as a compulsory or elective subject.
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Section 3: Guest Article
書誌情報 Eruditi : The CGCS Journal of Language Research and Education

巻 3, p. 41-56, 発行日 2019-07
権利
権利情報 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
出版者
出版者 Center for Global Communication Strategies, College of Arts & Sciences, The University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 13:17:38.476716
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3