WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "6484c2a3-62e6-4ad9-9892-99be15970a2e"}, "_deposit": {"id": "42964", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "42964"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00042964", "sets": ["7436", "7434"]}, "item_8_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2001-09", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "CF-132", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "Discussion paper series. CIRJE-F"}]}]}, "item_8_description_13": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "application/pdf", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_8_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Observers routinely claim that the Japanese government during the high-growth 1960s and 70s rationed and ultimately directed credit. It banned investments by foreigners, barred domestic competitors to banks, and capped loan interest rates. Through the resulting credit shortage, it manipulated credit to promote its industrial policy. In fact, the government did nothing of the sort. It did not bar foreign capital, did not block domestic rivals, and did not set maximum interest rates that bound. Using evidence on loans to all 1000-odd firms listed on Section 1 of the Tokyo Stock Exchange from 1968 to 1982, we show that the observed interest rates reflected borrower risk and mortgageable assets, and that banks did not use low-interest deposits to circumvent any interest caps. Instead, the loan market probably cleared at the nominal rates. We follow our empirical inquiry with a case study of one of the industies where the government tried hardest to direct credit: ocean shipping. We find no evidence of credit rationing. Rather, we show that non-conformist firms funded their projects readily outside authorized avenues -- so readily that the non-conformists grew with spectacular speed and earned their investors enormous returns.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_8_description_6": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Journal of Economics \u0026 Management Strategy, 13(1), 2004, p. 171-205. 掲載予定.", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}, {"subitem_description": "本文フィルはリンク先を参照のこと", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_8_publisher_20": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "日本経済国際共同センター"}]}, "item_8_relation_25": {"attribute_name": "関係URI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "http://www.cirje.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/research/dp/2001/2001cf132.pdf", "subitem_relation_type_select": "URI"}}]}, "item_8_source_id_10": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA11450569", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_8_subject_15": {"attribute_name": "日本十進分類法", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "330", "subitem_subject_scheme": "NDC"}]}, "item_8_text_21": {"attribute_name": "出版者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Center for International Research on the Japanese Economy"}]}, "item_8_text_34": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Discussion Paper"}]}, "item_8_text_4": {"attribute_name": "著者所属", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "University of Tokyo"}, {"subitem_text_value": "Harvard Law School"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "metadata only access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Miwa, Yoshiro"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "98812", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "J., Mark Ramseyer"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "98813", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "JEL: G21, G32, K22, L52, N25, O53", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "technical report", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh"}]}, "item_title": "Directed Credit? Capital Market Competition in High-Growth Japan", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Directed Credit? Capital Market Competition in High-Growth Japan"}]}, "item_type_id": "8", "owner": "1", "path": ["7436", "7434"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2261/2408", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2017-01-17"}, "publish_date": "2017-01-17", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "42964", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Directed Credit? Capital Market Competition in High-Growth Japan"], "weko_shared_id": null}
Directed Credit? Capital Market Competition in High-Growth Japan
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/2408
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/2408fa1b2055-5ab7-4e73-a3d7-6991d8817587
Item type | テクニカルレポート / Technical Report(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-01-17 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Directed Credit? Capital Market Competition in High-Growth Japan | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題 | JEL: G21, G32, K22, L52, N25, O53 | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh | |||||
タイプ | technical report | |||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||
著者 |
Miwa, Yoshiro
× Miwa, Yoshiro× J., Mark Ramseyer |
|||||
著者所属 | ||||||
著者所属 | University of Tokyo | |||||
著者所属 | ||||||
著者所属 | Harvard Law School | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Observers routinely claim that the Japanese government during the high-growth 1960s and 70s rationed and ultimately directed credit. It banned investments by foreigners, barred domestic competitors to banks, and capped loan interest rates. Through the resulting credit shortage, it manipulated credit to promote its industrial policy. In fact, the government did nothing of the sort. It did not bar foreign capital, did not block domestic rivals, and did not set maximum interest rates that bound. Using evidence on loans to all 1000-odd firms listed on Section 1 of the Tokyo Stock Exchange from 1968 to 1982, we show that the observed interest rates reflected borrower risk and mortgageable assets, and that banks did not use low-interest deposits to circumvent any interest caps. Instead, the loan market probably cleared at the nominal rates. We follow our empirical inquiry with a case study of one of the industies where the government tried hardest to direct credit: ocean shipping. We find no evidence of credit rationing. Rather, we show that non-conformist firms funded their projects readily outside authorized avenues -- so readily that the non-conformists grew with spectacular speed and earned their investors enormous returns. | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 13(1), 2004, p. 171-205. 掲載予定. | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 本文フィルはリンク先を参照のこと | |||||
書誌情報 |
Discussion paper series. CIRJE-F 巻 CF-132, 発行日 2001-09 |
|||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA11450569 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題 | 330 | |||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 日本経済国際共同センター | |||||
出版者別名 | ||||||
Center for International Research on the Japanese Economy | ||||||
関係URI | ||||||
識別子タイプ | URI | |||||
関連識別子 | http://www.cirje.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/research/dp/2001/2001cf132.pdf |