2026-03-13T15:09:31Z https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/oai

oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00036991 2022-12-19T04:11:34Z 23:195:5732:5740 9:504:5734:5741

Considering Avalokitavrata’s Criticism of the Yogācāra School : About the Interpretation of the Third Verse of Chapter I of Madhyāntavibhāga アヴァローキタヴラタの瑜伽行派批判についての一考察 : Madhyāntavibhāga 第I章第3偈の解釈をめぐって 新作, 慶明 87794 The third verse of chapter I (I-3) of the Madhyāntavibhāgakārikā (MAV-K) is one of the most important verses for the Yogācāra school. However, since Vasubandhu’s Madhyāntavibhāgabhāṣya (MAVBh), which is a commentary on MAV-K, is simple, there are two expressions that are difficult to understand. One of the two expressions is arthasattvapratibhāsasyānākāratvāt, which explains that artha is non-existent. The other expression was discussed in my previous article(IBK 60-2, pp. 975–972.). In Sthiramati’s Madhyāntavibhāgaṭīkv, a subcommentary on MAV-K, ākāra is considered a subjective cognitive function. However, we cannot obtain a clear interpretation of MAVBh on the basis of this interpretation. In this paper, we analyze Avalokitavrata’s criticism of the Yogācāra school’s interpretation of MAVBh in the Prajñāpradīpaṭīkā, which is a commentary on the Prajñāpradīpa. On the basis of Avalokitavrata’s interpretation, we conclude that ākāra means “image” in MAVBh. departmental bulletin paper 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室 2012-03-31 application/pdf インド哲学仏教学研究 19 91 103 AN10419736 09197907 https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/36991/files/ib019005.pdf https://doi.org/10.15083/00036982 http://hdl.handle.net/2261/54151 https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/records/36991 jpn