<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-03-06T23:25:45Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00039242">https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
      <header>
        <identifier>oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00039242</identifier>
        <datestamp>2022-12-19T04:14:06Z</datestamp>
        <setSpec>23:5633:6519:6551</setSpec>
        <setSpec>9:504:6521:6552</setSpec>
      </header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
          <dc:title>The Qualitative Difference in Acceptability in Extraposition from NP Sentences</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Shiobara, Kayono</dc:creator>
          <dc:creator>137960</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>930</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Extraposition from NP (EXNP)</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>preposition-stranding</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>pied-piping of a preposition</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>processin</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>application/pdf</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Extraposition from NP (EXNP) sentences in English exhibit a variety of syntactic, semantic and pragmatic properties. Shiobara (1997) analyzes EXNP in terms of sentence processing and accounts for the acceptability of EXNP sentences by syntactic and semantic/pragmatic processing principles. However, the degree of acceptability of each sentence is not necessarily the same. For example, an EXNP sentence with preposition-stranding is always found to be worse than a corresponding EXNP sentence with pied-piping of a preposition. This paper shows that the qualitative difference in acceptability in EXNP sentences results from the modified version of the Nested Dependency Constraint proposed by Fodor (1978).</dc:description>
          <dc:description>departmental bulletin paper</dc:description>
          <dc:publisher>Tokyo University English Linguistics Association</dc:publisher>
          <dc:date>1999-12</dc:date>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>Linguistic research : working papers in English linguistics</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>16</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>1</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>17</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>AA10462609</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/39242/files/lr016001.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.15083/00039233</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/2261/6768</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/records/39242</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
