{"created":"2021-03-01T06:34:20.175062+00:00","id":17042,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"9619f7d4-d1d1-46e1-b647-a28d1280c4b5"},"_deposit":{"id":"17042","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"17042"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00017042","sets":["55:864:912:916","9:504:867:914:917"]},"item_4_alternative_title_1":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Interaction of private and public interests in urban space management : On the Administrative Case Litigation Act Art. 10 para. 1 (<Featured Theme>The Birth and Future Perspectives of the Theory of \"Urban Planning Law\" in Japan)"}]},"item_4_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2010-03-10","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"3-4","bibliographicPageEnd":"159","bibliographicPageStart":"139","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"61","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"社會科學研究"}]}]},"item_4_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"都市空間は, 「多数の人々の諸活動と居住と生活の『場』」であるにもかかわらず, その法的理解にあっては, 被規制者の財産権と「公益」的規制という二面的な関係が視野の中心に置かれている. これに対して都市計画を「当該地域の空間形成に関する権限と利害についての, 地権者相互, あるいは地権者と非地権者住民との間における, 調整・分配ルール」とみなす立場からは, 被規制地権者以外の当該空間に対するステークホルダーの利害をどのように法的に構成し, 実体法的・訴訟法的にどのような位置づけを与えるかが, 理論的課題となってくる. 本稿は, 上のような問題意識を念頭に置きつつ, 行政事件訴訟法10条1項の主張制限「自己の法律上の利益に関係のない違法」に関する解釈論を分析したものである. 同条については, 行政処分の名宛人と第三者とを区別し, 前者は公益に関わる要件も主張できるが, 後者は個別的利益を保護し原告適格の基礎となる根拠規定違反に限り主張できるとする立場が裁判例上有力である. 他方, 近時の学説は, 名宛人-第三者のかかる二元論を相対化し, 第三者に対しても, 「公益上の理由による受忍」という構成をとることが可能な場合があることを指摘する. 都市空間に関わるステークホルダーの立場を法的に構成していく上で, この発想は有益である.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"City planning regulations should function as a set of rules for coordinating and distributing various interests surrounding a particular urban space. The actual implementation of regulations, however, tends to focus on the bilateral relationship between property rights and the \"public interest\", putting the interests of other stakeholders out of sight. The Administrative Case Litigation Act, Art.10 para.1, does not allow a plaintiff to allege illegality of an administrative disposition when such illegality has no relationship to the plaintiff's own interest. Recent attempts to re-interpret this article shed some light on the possibility of constructing such a stakeholder's interests as legally protected interests, upon which the administrative disposition infringes.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_4_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"27190","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"Kadomatsu, Narufumi"}]}]},"item_4_publisher_20":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"東京大学社会科学研究所"}]},"item_4_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00108966","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"03873307","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_4_subject_15":{"attribute_name":"日本十進分類法","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"300","subitem_subject_scheme":"NDC"}]},"item_4_text_21":{"attribute_name":"出版者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"神戸大学大学院法学研究科"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"角松, 生史"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"27189","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-06-08"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"shk061003007.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.6 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"shk061003007.pdf","url":"https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/17042/files/shk061003007.pdf"},"version_id":"4052313d-4a89-49e9-9ad4-cfecb1caffd8"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"都市空間管理","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"行政事件訴訟法10条1項","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"主張制限","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"法律上の利益","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"公益と私益","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"都市空間管理をめぐる私益と公益の交錯の一側面 : 行訴法10条1項「自己の法律上の利益に関係のない違法」をめぐって(<特集>日本における「都市法」論の生成と展望)","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"都市空間管理をめぐる私益と公益の交錯の一側面 : 行訴法10条1項「自己の法律上の利益に関係のない違法」をめぐって(<特集>日本における「都市法」論の生成と展望)"}]},"item_type_id":"4","owner":"1","path":["916","917"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2011-06-01"},"publish_date":"2011-06-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"17042","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["都市空間管理をめぐる私益と公益の交錯の一側面 : 行訴法10条1項「自己の法律上の利益に関係のない違法」をめぐって(<特集>日本における「都市法」論の生成と展望)"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":null},"updated":"2022-12-19T03:55:54.163673+00:00"}