{"created":"2021-03-01T06:34:28.220674+00:00","id":17167,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"45771384-1b97-4031-8c0d-6fb3a9701b71"},"_deposit":{"id":"17167","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"17167"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00017167","sets":["55:864:942:948","9:504:867:944:949"]},"item_4_alternative_title_1":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Right of Reply Reconsidered(<Featured Theme> Change in Law - asking for Principles of Justice as the Hope)"}]},"item_4_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2007-02-20","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"2","bibliographicPageEnd":"123","bibliographicPageStart":"93","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"58","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"社會科學研究"}]}]},"item_4_description_13":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"これまで反論権については, 主として, いわゆる「狭義の反論権」として, 名誉毀損の成立を前提とした救済手段としての反論掲載請求権が認められるか否かという文脈でその是非が議論されてきた.これに対して本稿は, いわゆる「広義の反論権」に焦点をあて, 成立可能性を論じた.本稿で筆者は, 第一に, マス・メディアの表現の自由には, 国家との関係において自律的である消極的な自由と, 自由で豊かな表現空間を実現するという制度としての自由という, 二つの自由が内包されており反論権はこの制度としての表現の自由をより充実させる利益があること, 第二に, 「広義の反論権」は個人の主観的権利という意味での権利ではなく, 反論を通じて人々が多様な意見に接するという社会全体の利益に支えらており, 第三に, だからこそ法的な制度としてではなく, press councilのような自主的で自律的な制度を通じて実現することが, 自律的な消極的な自由を犠牲にすることなく, 制度としての自由をよりよく発展させる上で有効であることを論じた.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"In the modern Japanese society, the \"\"Right of reply\"\", especially in broad sense, is not admitted. In this article, the author argues that the Mass Media has two aspects of free speech right, as an autonomous press and as an institutional structure of society. The right of reply influences only on the area of institutional structure of Mass Media freedom, and does not infringe the \"\"negative\"\" autonomous freedom. The government should not play a central role in this case, the author recommends an independent \"\"Press Council\"\".","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_4_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"107686","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"Someya, Manabu"}]}]},"item_4_publisher_20":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"東京大学社会科学研究所"}]},"item_4_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00108966","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"03873307","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_4_subject_15":{"attribute_name":"日本十進分類法","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"300","subitem_subject_scheme":"NDC"}]},"item_4_text_21":{"attribute_name":"出版者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Institute of Social Science, The University of Tokyo"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"染谷, 学"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"107685","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-06-26"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KJ00004699987.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"2.6 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KJ00004699987.pdf","url":"https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/17167/files/KJ00004699987.pdf"},"version_id":"e2f2cfaa-aa45-41c2-8298-189f2321a12f"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"反論権","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"マス・メディア","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"表現の自由","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"パブリックフォーラム","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"プレスカウンシル","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"反論権再考","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"反論権再考"}]},"item_type_id":"4","owner":"1","path":["948","949"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2008-10-02"},"publish_date":"2008-10-02","publish_status":"0","recid":"17167","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["反論権再考"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":null},"updated":"2022-12-19T03:55:59.860085+00:00"}