{"created":"2021-05-24T08:03:45.260641+00:00","id":2000142,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"b17e4ae3-59d4-41ee-afed-1d2f204242a9"},"_deposit":{"id":"2000142","owner":"1","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000142"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:02000142","sets":["67:68:4399:1617855555304","9:504:4401:1617855654207"]},"item_4_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"18","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"100","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"情報学研究 : 学環 : 東京大学大学院情報学環紀要","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_4_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"The philosophy and methods of evaluating outcomes of research activities differ widely across　the academic fields. Formerly, these evaluation frameworks were based on each research field　scenario, but recently, quantitative measures have become popular and are being applied across　various disciplines. The frequently applied measures are, for example, Science Citation Index for　articles, Impact Factor for academic journals, and h-index for the individual research. Although　these quantitative indices are helpful to visualize the dynamics of the production process of scientific　knowledge, they are inappropriate measures for evaluating the　“excellence” of individual researchers　and academic journals because the variances are too large. In addition, the citation data mainly　cover articles published in academic journals; thus, evaluating the achievements in the form of books,　such as textbooks and monographs, is difficult. Therefore, applying these indices is inappropriate　for researchers who put priorities in publishing studies on specific fields such as humanities.　Nevertheless, conspicuous misuse of these quantitative measures has been increasing, and they have　been applied as criteria in personnel evaluations, such as hiring and promotion, especially in recent　years. / The Leiden Manifesto, published in Nature in 2015, summarizes the problems with quantitative　measures and proposes 10 principles on how research achievements should be evaluated. It　states that the qualitative approach should take the main role in the evaluation, whereas the　quantitative measures should be used as supplementary. Moreover, the evaluation should consider　the characteristics of each field. This present study introduces four principles among the 10, which　are particularly important for interdisciplinary research and education organizations. Furthermore,　it reconfirms the necessity of multidimensional measures in the evaluation of interdisciplinary　achievements. / The evaluation of research performance is a dialog between academic and public society. It is not　only a reflection of the academic researchers’ desire or the requests from the public. A research　evaluation is a communication between different values of both parties, and therefore, difficulties to　a certain degree are inevitable. Those who are in the midst of this evaluation process, especially the　younger academicians, should not accept only one of the assessment measures, but rather seek a　compromise between the two to overcome the underlying issue.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_4_description_6":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"教員研究論文","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Other"},{"subitem_description":"Faculty Papers","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15083/0002000142","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_4_publisher_20":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"東京大学大学院情報学環","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_4_select_14":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_select_item":"publisher"}]},"item_4_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA12032633","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1880697X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"},{"subitem_source_identifier":"21878056","subitem_source_identifier_type":"EISSN"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"ja","subitem_text_value":"東京大学大学院情報学環"},{"subitem_text_language":"ja","subitem_text_value":"理化学研究所革新知能統合研究センター"},{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, the University of Tokyo"},{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Research Project (AIP)"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorAffiliations":[{"affiliationNames":[{"affiliationName":"東京大学","affiliationNameLang":"ja"},{"affiliationName":"The University of Tokyo","affiliationNameLang":"en"}]},{"affiliationNames":[{"affiliationName":"理化学研究所","affiliationNameLang":"ja"},{"affiliationName":"RIKEN","affiliationNameLang":"en"}]}],"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"佐倉, 統","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"Sakura, Osamu","creatorNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2021-05-24"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"100_2.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.3MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/2000142/files/100_2.pdf"},"version_id":"4aede95c-c6b1-4df6-82f9-fa91f28f3e63"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"業績評価","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"定量評価","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"定性評価","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"ライデン声明","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"学際組織","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Evaluation of Research Products","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Quantitative Evaluation","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Qualitatative Evaluation","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Leiden Manifesto","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Interdisciplinarity","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"研究業績とは何（であるべき）か？","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"研究業績とは何（であるべき）か？","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"How is (or Should) the Performance of Academic Researchers (be) Evaluated?","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"4","owner":"1","path":["1617855555304","1617855654207"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2021-05-24"},"publish_date":"2021-05-24","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000142","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["研究業績とは何（であるべき）か？"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":null},"updated":"2022-12-19T05:29:06.479445+00:00"}