{"created":"2022-03-08T07:47:11.581399+00:00","id":2003278,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"19e1da09-083c-4265-a361-2a4d6a3f3c61"},"_deposit":{"id":"2003278","owner":"1","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2003278"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:02003278","sets":["62:828:8416:1646725079037","9:504:831:8418:1646724930308"]},"author_link":[],"item_4_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2022-01-29","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"2-3","bibliographicPageEnd":"84","bibliographicPageStart":"17","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"83","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"經濟學論集","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"The Journal of Economics","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_4_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"2016年１月の安倍総理の発言とともに「『同一労働同一賃金』は突如として非正規格差問題解決の政治的スローガンになった」（神吉，2019，89頁）．このスローガンの下に推進されることとなった「政策」の中核は，「非正規格差問題解決」であり，「正規雇用労働者」と「非正規雇用労働者」の間に存在する処遇面での「格差」「問題」の「解決」である．この「政策」は，その実質的内容のみならず，目的と目標，政策手段，各「政策手段」の期待される有効性，有効だと判断し期待する論拠と証拠，さらに「政策」実施とともに予想される各種の弊害・コストなどについて，不明確・不透明な点が多い．「いつ，どこで，誰が，何を決めたのか？政策として具体的に何を実施しているのか？鳴り物入りでスタートして本格的に実施されているはずの政策の実質・実態は何か？」と考え始めた読者を，「いったい何が始まったのか……」と困惑させるだろう． / この「政策」に見る，「曖昧であり漠然としすぎて，誰にも容易には手をつけられない」不安・不満を多くの国民に抱かせるという「特徴」は日本の政策形成（policy making）の中で特別・特殊・特異ではない．2016年頃から政府の基本政策として採用・推進が本格化したEBPM（evidence-based policy making）の観点からみると，この政策は，EBPMの適用が最優先されるべき「教科書的事例」にあたり，EBPM推進のモデルケースになり得ると考えて「EBPMのススメ」を副題とした．政策の具体的内容の決定に際して依拠した論拠と証拠を国民に明示し，理解と批判的検討・見直し，さらに再設計と代替策の提案などを実質的に可能にするように政策決定（policy making）過程の変革を求める必要がある．それ以外に，現状のような事態およびその再発・継続の回避・防止は期待できない． / （日本を含む）先進諸国で急速に進行してきたworking-time practices等での「the diversityの展開」を無視し，現状固定，さらに逆行する多様な施策を政策として推進しつつある政府には「正規雇用労働者」・「非正規雇用労働者」間の処遇面などでの「格差」「差別」などの表現を使用しないように求めることも適切かもしれない．","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"In January 2016, Prime Minister Abe announced his plan to promote“ equal pay for equal work.” In the process, he generated “the political slogan that the regular-irregular inequality required ‘equal pay for equal work’”（ Kanki, 2019, p.89）. The government needed to“ solve,” in other words, the“ inequality” in the“ treatment” of regular workers and irregular workers. / The slogan obviously assumes that there is a problem to be “solved.” In the process, it leaves unaddressed the details of the objectives in question and the policies proposed. It leaves unanalyzed the costs, benefits, and likely effectiveness of any measures involved. It leaves undisclosed who actually promoted the policy and why. Necessarily, it also leaves hidden what those undisclosed actors might actually be trying to accomplish through their policies. / Since 2016, the Japanese government has at least nominally promoted “evidence-based policy making”（ EBPM） principles. The equal-pay-for-equal-work debate presents a near-perfect case for EBPM. Citizens need to know the substantive details of any policies proposed, and the logic and evidence behind them. Good governance dictates that the government invite critical examination and counter-proposals. EBPM principles would have promoted that process. Unfortunately, the government egregiously failed to follow those principles. / In the course of analyzing the government’s foray into the equal-pay-for-equal-work dispute, I offer an introduction to EBPM principles. Note that were the government to take seriously those principles, it would need to explore the reasons behind the increased diversity of employment contracts across the developed world. In the process, it would probably also abandon terms like “difference （kakusa）” and “discrimination （sabetsu）” in discussing “regular” and “irregular” employment conditions.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_4_description_6":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"論文/Articles","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15083/0002003278","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_4_publisher_20":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"東京大学大学院経済学研究科","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"},{"subitem_publisher":"Graduate School of Economics, The University of Tokyo ","subitem_publisher_language":"en"}]},"item_4_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00070411","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0022-9768","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"ja","subitem_text_value":"大阪学院大学"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorAffiliations":[{"affiliationNames":[{"affiliationName":"大阪学院大学","affiliationNameLang":"ja"}]}],"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"三輪, 芳朗","creatorNameLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2022-03-08"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"econ083020303.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.8 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/2003278/files/econ083020303.pdf"},"version_id":"18f2b814-ef2c-4d1e-b9cc-c6bb08ba3a07"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"同一労働同一賃金","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"非正規格差問題解決「政策」","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"政治的スローガン","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"一億総活躍国民会議","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"同一労働同一賃金の実現に向けた検討会（柳川検討会）","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"労働政策審議会","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"「正規雇用労働者」と「非正規雇用労働者」","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"the diversity in working-time practices","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"EBPM （evidence-based policy making）","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"論拠と証拠","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"政策のコストと弊害","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"「政府（政策）主導型」の格差・差別","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"equal-pay-for-equal-work”","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"“ the regular-irregular inequality”","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"the political slogan","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"\u001fe Central Labour Relations Commission （roudou seisaku shingikai）","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"the diversity in working-time practices","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"EBPM （evidence-based policy making）","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"the bene\u001et and cost of policy measures","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"“the government（policy）-led”“di\u001derence（kakusa）” and“ discrimination（sabetsu）”","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"「同一労働同一賃金」のスローガンの下で推進される非正規格差問題解決「政策」 : EBPM（evidence-based policy making）のススメ","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"「同一労働同一賃金」のスローガンの下で推進される非正規格差問題解決「政策」 : EBPM（evidence-based policy making）のススメ","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Regular and Irregular Employment Terms and “Equal-Work-for-Equal-Pay” Policies : The Need for Evidence-Based Policy Making","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"4","owner":"1","path":["1646725079037","1646724930308"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2022-03-08"},"publish_date":"2022-03-08","publish_status":"0","recid":"2003278","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["「同一労働同一賃金」のスローガンの下で推進される非正規格差問題解決「政策」 : EBPM（evidence-based policy making）のススメ"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2022-12-19T05:33:23.178507+00:00"}