{"created":"2023-07-11T04:06:31.664464+00:00","id":2007635,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"b975a12b-90f8-44ce-9543-517c230fe84a"},"_deposit":{"created_by":18,"id":"2007635","owner":"18","owners":[18],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2007635"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:02007635","sets":["43:60:1094:1689044360437","9:504:1096:1689044314683"]},"author_link":[],"item_4_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2022","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"19","bibliographicPageStart":"3","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"32","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"相関社会科学 = Komaba Studies in Society","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_4_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Standard act consequentialism directly evaluates actions. But how can and should, if any, consequentialists evaluate nonaction objects such as rules, motives, and social institutions? Since the mid\u000220th century, much ink has been spent on the validity of indirect consequentialist views, e.g., rule\u0002consequentialism, motive-consequentialism, and virtue-consequentialism, as alternatives to act  consequentialism. Furthermore, global consequentialism, a view that evaluates everything in terms of its  consequence, has been gaining popularity in recent decades.\nThis paper concerns how consequentialism can and should assess nonaction objects. One challenge to this inquiry is conceptual and terminological confusion hindering an appropriate treatment of this question. Given this, the purpose of this paper is two-folded. First, I off er a framework that distinguishes three often overlooked concepts: a focal point, a reference point, and a level. Not only is this framework useful for my purpose, but it will also promote a general understanding of the structure of consequentialism. Second, I utilize this framework to examine conceptual spaces of consequentialist views that arise from it. Eliminating all views with at least prima facie diffi culties, I ultimately conclude that, among the conceptually possible views, only two positions survive the scrutiny, viz., act-local direct multi\u0002level consequentialism and act-local indirect multi-level consequentialism. Given this, we must return to the traditional debate between direct and indirect consequentialism.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_4_description_6":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"一般論文","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Other"},{"subitem_description":"Papers","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15083/0002007635","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_4_publisher_20":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"東京大学大学院総合文化研究科国際社会科学専攻 ","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"},{"subitem_publisher":"Department of Advanced Social and International Studies, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo","subitem_publisher_language":"en"}]},"item_4_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10181474","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"ja","subitem_text_value":"東京大学大学院総合文化研究科国際社会科学専攻"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorAffiliations":[{"affiliationNames":[{"affiliationName":"東京大学","affiliationNameLang":"ja"},{"affiliationName":"The University of Tokyo","affiliationNameLang":"en"}]}],"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"髙橋, 礼","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"TAKAHASHI, Rei","creatorNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2023-07-11"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"vol3201.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.1 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/2007635/files/vol3201.pdf"},"version_id":"da7ec44b-02a3-460f-8aa6-9003a920cdc3"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"帰結主義における行為とそれ以外 : その焦点、参照点、レベル","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"帰結主義における行為とそれ以外 : その焦点、参照点、レベル","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Actions and Nonactions in Consequentialism : Focal Point, Reference Point, and Level","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"4","owner":"18","path":["1689044360437","1689044314683"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2023-07-11"},"publish_date":"2023-07-11","publish_status":"0","recid":"2007635","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["帰結主義における行為とそれ以外 : その焦点、参照点、レベル"],"weko_creator_id":"18","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-07-11T04:06:44.519159+00:00"}