{"created":"2021-03-01T06:45:41.749112+00:00","id":27540,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"69481d88-b1ad-4351-9585-2e03183fea74"},"_deposit":{"id":"27540","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"27540"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00027540","sets":["23:3252:3253:3277","9:504:3256:3278"]},"item_4_alternative_title_1":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"On the Source of Normativity in Natural Language : The Case of Contradictory Sentences"}]},"item_4_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2012-09-30","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"276","bibliographicPageStart":"255","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"32","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"東京大学言語学論集"}]}]},"item_4_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"矛盾文X n'est pas X(「XはXでない」)は、単なる事実報告(「問題の対象はXと呼ばれない」)として解釈される場合と、規範性言明(「問題の対象はXと呼ばれるべきではない」)として解釈される場合とがある。規範性を表す表現がないにもかかわらず、矛盾文が規範性言明としての解釈をもつのは、(i)語Xの適用に不一致が生じ、(ii)その不一致が事実認識の不一致によるものではないとみなされ、(iii)不一致を起こしている他者を話者が自らの言語共同体の成員(同胞)とみなし続けるときであり、かつそのときだけである。コンディヤックの「二つのまちがい」をめぐる議論をふまえると、事実認識に基づかない判断がくいちがう場面では、ただちに、当事者が属する言語共同体の存在が浮かびあがってくる。このとき、ウィトゲンシュタインの言う言語(によるコミュニケーション)の成立基盤を回復すぺく、言語使用者たちが再び一つの言語体系に収束していこうとする運動が生じ、ルソーの「同胞と憐れみ」の原理により、言語使用の不一致を起こしている他者は「矯正されるべき他者」として立ち現れる。こうして、語の適用の不一致から自然言語の規範性が生じる過程を自然な一本道として理解することができる。「べし」という規範性概念は、「べし」という言語表現のないところから生じるのである。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"Contradictory sentences of the form X is not X can be interpreted either factually (\"Some X's are not called X.\") or normatively (\"Some X's should not be called X.\"). This paper shows that X is not X is interpreted normatively if and only if (i) there is a disagreement in the application of the word X, (ii) the disagreement in the application of X is not attributable to the disagreement in the recognition of the situation, and (iii) the person applying the word X differently is still considered to belong to the same linguistic community. If both of these conditions are met, the person in question is treated as 'someone whose use of the language should be corrected'. This is the reason why X is X can be interpreted normatively despite the fact that it contains no word which lexically expresses normativity. This, I argue, is the only source of normativity in natural language.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_4_description_6":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"論文 Articles","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"60479","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"Sakai, Tomohiro"}]}]},"item_4_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15083/00027531","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_4_publisher_20":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部言語学研究室"}]},"item_4_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10148796","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"13458663","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_4_subject_15":{"attribute_name":"日本十進分類法","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"801","subitem_subject_scheme":"NDC"}]},"item_4_text_21":{"attribute_name":"出版者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Department of Linguistics, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, Faculty of Letters, The University of Tokyo"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"跡見学園女子大学"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"酒井, 智宏"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"60478","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-06-12"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"ggr032009.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.8 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"ggr032009.pdf","url":"https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/27540/files/ggr032009.pdf"},"version_id":"a02ddfe0-b39d-4716-9cb5-f029950b2893"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"矛盾文","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"規範性","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"判断","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"言語共同体","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"contradictory sentence","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"normativity","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"judgment","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"linguistic community","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"矛盾文と自然言語における規範性の源泉","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"矛盾文と自然言語における規範性の源泉"}]},"item_type_id":"4","owner":"1","path":["3278","3277"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2012-12-18"},"publish_date":"2012-12-18","publish_status":"0","recid":"27540","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["矛盾文と自然言語における規範性の源泉"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":null},"updated":"2022-12-19T04:05:31.449614+00:00"}