WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "63fceac6-a601-4a6b-a691-3a3f94c6b38b"}, "_deposit": {"id": "30482", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "30482"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00030482", "sets": ["4172", "4171"]}, "item_4_alternative_title_1": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "“ Belief ” and Fiction : Constructing a Theory from the View Point of the Analytical Philosophy"}]}, "item_4_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2010-03-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "136", "bibliographicPageStart": "119", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "27", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "東京大学宗教学年報"}]}]}, "item_4_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper is concerned with the construction of an original theory which explains how the worldview, including the division between “reality and fiction,” is formed.//In modern times, the very time of the rise of science, the contrast between “reality and fiction” was considered to be absolute. This was because modern science excluded objects with which it could not deal with from the “real” world, so that the “reality” recognized by it became the only “reality.” Things regarded as “fictions” became something that could not have influence on the “reality” at all. Thus, the contemporary “common worldview” based on the doctrine of science for science’s sake was formed.//However, our actual worldview cannot possibly be fully covered by science. “Reality” is not so firm, and “fiction” obviously has some power to affect “reality.” This is especially obvious in situations such as conflicts between natural sciences and various religions today. The notion of “belief” becomes complicated, because “reality” can be “reality” only when it is “believed.”//Needless to say, “belief” is a very basic notion in the studies of religion, so it is important to pay special attention to the significance of this “belief,” analyze and describe more precisely how it works in the formation of our worldview. (Here, the meaning of “信” or “belief” is interpreted in a unique way.)//The analytic philosophy is the basis of my theory. It is a very effective method for analyzing religious discourses because it is a stream of philosophy emerging after the Linguistic Turn, which is represented by Wittgenstein and others, and because it stands close to the philosophy of language and philosophy of science. In this study, I particularly focus on and base my argument on the philosophy of W. V. O. Quine, and start my discussion from his key terms such as “holism,” “relativism” and “conceptual scheme.” While expanding them theoretically, for example, by positing a notion of “meta conceptual scheme” and examining the dynamism between “conceptual schemes” and “meta conceptual scheme,” I formulate an original theory which has the notion of “belief” at its core.//In conclusion, “belief” plays the role of the ground that is not there intrinsically. When fiction is “believed,” “reality” arises. This is probably an important viewpoint necessary for approaching the studies of religion in this post-modern time.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_4_description_6": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "論文/Articles", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_4_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "66899", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "YACHI, Yu"}]}]}, "item_4_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.15083/00030473", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_4_publisher_20": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "東京大学文学部宗教学研究室"}]}, "item_4_source_id_8": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "02896400", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_4_subject_15": {"attribute_name": "日本十進分類法", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "160", "subitem_subject_scheme": "NDC"}]}, "item_4_text_21": {"attribute_name": "出版者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo"}]}, "item_4_text_34": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Departmental Bulletin Paper"}]}, "item_4_text_4": {"attribute_name": "著者所属", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "東京大学大学院"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "谷内, 悠"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "66898", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-06-12"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "rel027009.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "368.2 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 368200.0, "url": {"label": "rel027009.pdf", "url": "https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/30482/files/rel027009.pdf"}, "version_id": "78fd5577-ab5d-472d-97a2-d8c010de83ae"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "「信」と虚構について : 分析哲学による理論構築", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "「信」と虚構について : 分析哲学による理論構築"}]}, "item_type_id": "4", "owner": "1", "path": ["4172", "4171"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.15083/00030473", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2014-11-12"}, "publish_date": "2014-11-12", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "30482", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["「信」と虚構について : 分析哲学による理論構築"], "weko_shared_id": null}
「信」と虚構について : 分析哲学による理論構築
https://doi.org/10.15083/00030473
https://doi.org/10.15083/00030473bda3b2de-21f0-4186-b8ad-77db6e42a7ac
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
rel027009.pdf (368.2 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2014-11-12 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 「信」と虚構について : 分析哲学による理論構築 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15083/00030473 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | “ Belief ” and Fiction : Constructing a Theory from the View Point of the Analytical Philosophy | |||||
著者 |
谷内, 悠
× 谷内, 悠 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子 | 66899 | |||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
姓名 | YACHI, Yu | |||||
著者所属 | ||||||
著者所属 | 東京大学大学院 | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | This paper is concerned with the construction of an original theory which explains how the worldview, including the division between “reality and fiction,” is formed.//In modern times, the very time of the rise of science, the contrast between “reality and fiction” was considered to be absolute. This was because modern science excluded objects with which it could not deal with from the “real” world, so that the “reality” recognized by it became the only “reality.” Things regarded as “fictions” became something that could not have influence on the “reality” at all. Thus, the contemporary “common worldview” based on the doctrine of science for science’s sake was formed.//However, our actual worldview cannot possibly be fully covered by science. “Reality” is not so firm, and “fiction” obviously has some power to affect “reality.” This is especially obvious in situations such as conflicts between natural sciences and various religions today. The notion of “belief” becomes complicated, because “reality” can be “reality” only when it is “believed.”//Needless to say, “belief” is a very basic notion in the studies of religion, so it is important to pay special attention to the significance of this “belief,” analyze and describe more precisely how it works in the formation of our worldview. (Here, the meaning of “信” or “belief” is interpreted in a unique way.)//The analytic philosophy is the basis of my theory. It is a very effective method for analyzing religious discourses because it is a stream of philosophy emerging after the Linguistic Turn, which is represented by Wittgenstein and others, and because it stands close to the philosophy of language and philosophy of science. In this study, I particularly focus on and base my argument on the philosophy of W. V. O. Quine, and start my discussion from his key terms such as “holism,” “relativism” and “conceptual scheme.” While expanding them theoretically, for example, by positing a notion of “meta conceptual scheme” and examining the dynamism between “conceptual schemes” and “meta conceptual scheme,” I formulate an original theory which has the notion of “belief” at its core.//In conclusion, “belief” plays the role of the ground that is not there intrinsically. When fiction is “believed,” “reality” arises. This is probably an important viewpoint necessary for approaching the studies of religion in this post-modern time. | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 論文/Articles | |||||
書誌情報 |
東京大学宗教学年報 巻 27, p. 119-136, 発行日 2010-03-31 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 02896400 | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題 | 160 | |||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 東京大学文学部宗教学研究室 | |||||
出版者別名 | ||||||
Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo |