WEKO3
アイテム
蜘蛛とその糸 : ガナナート・オベーセーカラの精神分析人類学をめぐって
https://doi.org/10.15083/00030638
https://doi.org/10.15083/00030638e5fa469b-01d9-4f09-ac30-7881e9778a43
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
rel01103.pdf (1.3 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2011-10-13 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 蜘蛛とその糸 : ガナナート・オベーセーカラの精神分析人類学をめぐって | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00030638 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Spider and its thread ; On Obeyesekere's psychoanalytic anthropology | |||||
| 著者 |
松岡, 秀明
× 松岡, 秀明 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 67231 | |||||
| 姓名 | Matsuoka, Hideaki | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | 東京大学大学院博士課程 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Psychoanalytic anthropology as presented by Gananath Obeyesekere in his Medusa's Hair and The Work of Culture offers us a method for the study of individual religious experience. By comparing Obeyesekere's psychoanalytic anthropology with Clifford Geertz's interpretive anthropology, this paper examines the possibilities and problems of Obeyesekere's work. Although both anthropologists are influenced by Max Weber, their approaches are completely different. Comparing these approaches to each other makes the characteristics of Obeyesekere's approach clear. The foci of this comparison are as follows ; (1) How the anthropologists understand symbols and meanings, (2) What they think about psychological interpretations in anthropology, (3) How they perceive cultural relativism. There are some problems with Obeyesekere's approach. (1) He tends to be dogmatic in his use of psychoanalytic theory. (2) He does not problematize the concept of "Human Nature". (3) Although he considers the relationship between anthropologist and informants, his analysis of the relationship between himself and his own informants is insufficient. Despite these shortcomings, Obeyesekere's work has significance ; Obeyesekere considers not only the web of meanings but also, the "spider at work", i. e. the people who weave the meanings. By creating the analytical idea "personal symbol", Obeyesekere tries to understand the connection between individuals and public culture in terms of symbols. In this respect, his work attempts to understand a dynamic of meaning something, which Geertz's work ignores. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
東京大学宗教学年報 巻 11, p. 33-48, 発行日 1994-03-30 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02896400 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 160 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学文学部宗教学研究室 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo | ||||||
