{"created":"2021-03-01T06:50:10.812282+00:00","id":31603,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"e5c52edf-a9d6-42c6-a871-45b854a95168"},"_deposit":{"id":"31603","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"31603"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00031603","sets":["9:504:4297:4332","97:4295:4331"]},"item_4_alternative_title_1":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Kiyoo Tomeoka and Seikatsu-Tsuzurikata in the Controversy between Shuichi Katsuta and Satoru Umene : A History of Problems on Seikatsu-Kyoiku in Japan After W. W. II 〔I〕"}]},"item_4_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"1998-03-26","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"61","bibliographicPageStart":"53","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"38","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"東京大学大学院教育学研究科紀要"}]}]},"item_4_description_13":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"The controversy between Shuichi Katsuta and Satoru Umene took place in 1952,facing a crisis of dividing of social studies. At that time, Katsuta was the leader of the Kyokaken (the Conference-group of Educational Science), and Umene was the vice-chairman of the Koaren (Core-Curriculum League). After the controversy, Kyokaken has come to acquire greater influence over educational circles than the Koaren. Examining the following two points, in this paper, I try to read out a problem over the theory of Seikatsu-Kyoiku (Education for Life) in Japan after W. W. II, from the controversy. First, Umene insisted that his theory about social studies has developed from Shakai-Kenkyuka (Social Research Subject)-the idea shaped by Kiyoo Toneoka. However, no one has pointed out the connection between the two, though they argued about the same educational theory. Secondly, Tomeoka proposed Shakai-Kenkyu-ka, when he criticized Seikatsu-Tsuzurikata. Later, both Katsuta and Umene evaluated Yamabiko-Gakko or Seikatsu-Tsuzurikata. I try to examine those evaluation and criticism, comparing their characteristic of Seikatsu-Kyoiku. After of all, I want to define what was the problem on the theory of Seikatsu-Kyoiku before and after the W. W. II.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_4_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"69931","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"Kimma, Kuniharu"}]}]},"item_4_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15083/00031594","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_4_publisher_20":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"東京大学大学院教育学研究科"}]},"item_4_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10516641","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"13421050","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_4_subject_15":{"attribute_name":"日本十進分類法","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"370","subitem_subject_scheme":"NDC"},{"subitem_subject":"371.5","subitem_subject_scheme":"NDC"},{"subitem_subject":"375.3","subitem_subject_scheme":"NDC"},{"subitem_subject":"375.86","subitem_subject_scheme":"NDC"}]},"item_4_text_21":{"attribute_name":"出版者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"The Graduate School of Education, University of Tokyo"}]},"item_4_text_4":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"教育学コース"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"金馬, 国晴"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"69930","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-06-12"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KJ00002401027.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.0 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KJ00002401027.pdf","url":"https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/31603/files/KJ00002401027.pdf"},"version_id":"e47ccf91-f9da-440e-8e14-dbb4f632e970"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"勝田・梅根論争における留岡清男と生活綴方 : 戦後日本生活教育問題史〔I〕","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"勝田・梅根論争における留岡清男と生活綴方 : 戦後日本生活教育問題史〔I〕"}]},"item_type_id":"4","owner":"1","path":["4331","4332"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2011-01-13"},"publish_date":"2011-01-13","publish_status":"0","recid":"31603","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["勝田・梅根論争における留岡清男と生活綴方 : 戦後日本生活教育問題史〔I〕"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":null},"updated":"2022-12-19T04:07:57.780977+00:00"}