WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "20cfdff7-fbcb-4dd2-8169-05b4ebbf627f"}, "_deposit": {"id": "47612", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "47612"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00047612", "sets": ["7567", "7566"]}, "item_4_alternative_title_1": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "A \"Heretical\" Conception of Early American Nationalism : Reexamining the Force Bill Debate in the Nullification Crisis (1828-33)"}]}, "item_4_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2015-03", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "180", "bibliographicPageStart": "163", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "15", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "アメリカ太平洋研究 = Pacific and American studies"}]}]}, "item_4_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "In recent years, the significance of passion in political sphere has become emphasized in keeping with the trend of criticizing the reason-centered approach. Although it might seem self-evident that politics cannot be separated from emotional motivations, this has not been fully appreciated in historical works on early American politics. The aim of this paper is to reinterpret the Nullification Crisis (1828–33) by focusing on the dimension of passion behind the seemingly reasonable deliberations. The Nullification Crisis was a crisis of disunion, which was triggered by the attempt of South Carolina to nullify the federal tariffs. In response to South Carolina’s nullification, President Andrew Jackson attempted to send the federal forces to South Carolina. In order to fight back Jackson’s action, military volunteers were recruited in South Carolina. Radical malcontents in the state even claimed the state’s right of secession from the Union. On the verge of military collision, Congress passed both the Compromise Tariff Bill and the Force Bill, which eventually settled the crisis. This study especially examines why the Force Bill had to be enacted in spite of the fact that the crisis had already been mitigated by the tariff compromise. The main focus here is on the long neglected linkage between the compromising schemes of reducing tariff and the theoretical debate over sovereignty. It will be concluded that the Force Bill was enacted not because warfare was impending but because the Northern pro-tariff leaders wanted to relieve their frustrations over the tariff reduction.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_4_description_6": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "論文", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}, {"subitem_description": "Articles", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_4_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "142770", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "ENDO, HIROBUMI"}]}]}, "item_4_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.15083/00047602", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_4_publisher_20": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "東京大学大学院総合文化研究科附属グローバル地域研究機構アメリカ太平洋地域研究センター"}]}, "item_4_source_id_10": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA11562201", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_4_source_id_8": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "13462989", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_4_text_21": {"attribute_name": "出版者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Center for Pacific and American Studies, Institute for Advanced Global Studies, The University of Tokyo"}]}, "item_4_text_34": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Departmental Bulletin Paper"}]}, "item_4_text_4": {"attribute_name": "著者所属", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "東京大学"}, {"subitem_text_value": "ニューヨーク州立大学"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "遠藤, 寛文"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "142769", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-08-07"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "pas015013.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.2 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1200000.0, "url": {"label": "pas015013.pdf", "url": "https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/47612/files/pas015013.pdf"}, "version_id": "a1d34d74-9d4c-453f-a6d6-4da3a7bf85af"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "連邦の統合と「異端」の国家観 : 無効宣言論争(1828-33)における強制徴収法案の意義をめぐって", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "連邦の統合と「異端」の国家観 : 無効宣言論争(1828-33)における強制徴収法案の意義をめぐって"}]}, "item_type_id": "4", "owner": "1", "path": ["7567", "7566"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.15083/00047602", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2017-07-20"}, "publish_date": "2017-07-20", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "47612", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["連邦の統合と「異端」の国家観 : 無効宣言論争(1828-33)における強制徴収法案の意義をめぐって"], "weko_shared_id": null}
連邦の統合と「異端」の国家観 : 無効宣言論争(1828-33)における強制徴収法案の意義をめぐって
https://doi.org/10.15083/00047602
https://doi.org/10.15083/00047602179a639b-7faa-4851-999e-50c40342b420
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
pas015013.pdf (1.2 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-07-20 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 連邦の統合と「異端」の国家観 : 無効宣言論争(1828-33)における強制徴収法案の意義をめぐって | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15083/00047602 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | A "Heretical" Conception of Early American Nationalism : Reexamining the Force Bill Debate in the Nullification Crisis (1828-33) | |||||
著者 |
遠藤, 寛文
× 遠藤, 寛文 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子 | 142770 | |||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
姓名 | ENDO, HIROBUMI | |||||
著者所属 | ||||||
著者所属 | 東京大学 | |||||
著者所属 | ||||||
著者所属 | ニューヨーク州立大学 | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | In recent years, the significance of passion in political sphere has become emphasized in keeping with the trend of criticizing the reason-centered approach. Although it might seem self-evident that politics cannot be separated from emotional motivations, this has not been fully appreciated in historical works on early American politics. The aim of this paper is to reinterpret the Nullification Crisis (1828–33) by focusing on the dimension of passion behind the seemingly reasonable deliberations. The Nullification Crisis was a crisis of disunion, which was triggered by the attempt of South Carolina to nullify the federal tariffs. In response to South Carolina’s nullification, President Andrew Jackson attempted to send the federal forces to South Carolina. In order to fight back Jackson’s action, military volunteers were recruited in South Carolina. Radical malcontents in the state even claimed the state’s right of secession from the Union. On the verge of military collision, Congress passed both the Compromise Tariff Bill and the Force Bill, which eventually settled the crisis. This study especially examines why the Force Bill had to be enacted in spite of the fact that the crisis had already been mitigated by the tariff compromise. The main focus here is on the long neglected linkage between the compromising schemes of reducing tariff and the theoretical debate over sovereignty. It will be concluded that the Force Bill was enacted not because warfare was impending but because the Northern pro-tariff leaders wanted to relieve their frustrations over the tariff reduction. | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 論文 | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Articles | |||||
書誌情報 |
アメリカ太平洋研究 = Pacific and American studies 巻 15, p. 163-180, 発行日 2015-03 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 13462989 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA11562201 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 東京大学大学院総合文化研究科附属グローバル地域研究機構アメリカ太平洋地域研究センター | |||||
出版者別名 | ||||||
Center for Pacific and American Studies, Institute for Advanced Global Studies, The University of Tokyo |