WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "5b355c24-011b-4cf9-b1cc-deff8d578e09"}, "_deposit": {"id": "47614", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "47614"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00047614", "sets": ["7567", "7566"]}, "item_4_alternative_title_1": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "The Extent of Slaveholder’s Rights in the Early 19th Century North Carolina : An Examination of Court Decisions Written by Thomas Ruffin"}]}, "item_4_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2015-03", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "217", "bibliographicPageStart": "200", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "15", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "アメリカ太平洋研究 = Pacific and American studies"}]}]}, "item_4_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This is a study of two articles written by Thomas Ruffin, who was known to be a respectable Chief Justice of North Carolina State Supreme Court in the first half of nineteenth century. His infamous decision of State v. Mann declared in 1829 that “the power of the master must be absolute, to render the submission of the slave perfect.” This case granted slaveholders absolute power to rule over their slaves in possession. However ten years later in State v. Hoover, Ruffin modified his opinion towards slaveholders stating that they must not kill their slaves. Through a close analysis of these decisions, this article examines the reason why he limited the power of slaveholders. Previous studies suggest Ruffin’s opinion towards slaves changed because he developed a sense of humanism and demanded slaveholders to be more benign. However, these studies overlooked what was discussed in the lower county courts and the local matters which require attention. In State v. Mann, Ruffin overruled a county court’s decision influenced by his ideas about master and slave relationship. He stated that seeking mutual profit was the purpose of the relationship and the slaveholders must be granted with absolute power to secure such profit. However in State v. Hoover, the judge chose to affirm the county court judgment due to a lack of the defendant’s disposition to properly rule a slave. Though Ruffin’s did demonstrate a kind of humanism towards slaves, his decisions altogether strengthened popular pro-slavery arguments which proliferated in the antebellum South.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_4_description_6": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "論文", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}, {"subitem_description": "Articles", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_4_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "142774", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "KODAMA, MAKI"}]}]}, "item_4_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.15083/00047604", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_4_publisher_20": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "東京大学大学院総合文化研究科附属グローバル地域研究機構アメリカ太平洋地域研究センター"}]}, "item_4_source_id_10": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA11562201", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_4_source_id_8": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "13462989", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_4_text_21": {"attribute_name": "出版者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Center for Pacific and American Studies, Institute for Advanced Global Studies, The University of Tokyo"}]}, "item_4_text_34": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Departmental Bulletin Paper"}]}, "item_4_text_4": {"attribute_name": "著者所属", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "東京大学"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "児玉, 真希"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "142773", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-08-07"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "pas015015.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.2 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1200000.0, "url": {"label": "pas015015.pdf", "url": "https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/47614/files/pas015015.pdf"}, "version_id": "0e1183b0-87c6-4148-a177-14cbcf7d20fd"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "19世紀前半のノースカロライナ州に見る奴隷所有者の権利 : トマス・ラフィンが下した判決のテキストからの考察", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "19世紀前半のノースカロライナ州に見る奴隷所有者の権利 : トマス・ラフィンが下した判決のテキストからの考察"}]}, "item_type_id": "4", "owner": "1", "path": ["7567", "7566"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.15083/00047604", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2017-07-20"}, "publish_date": "2017-07-20", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "47614", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["19世紀前半のノースカロライナ州に見る奴隷所有者の権利 : トマス・ラフィンが下した判決のテキストからの考察"], "weko_shared_id": null}
19世紀前半のノースカロライナ州に見る奴隷所有者の権利 : トマス・ラフィンが下した判決のテキストからの考察
https://doi.org/10.15083/00047604
https://doi.org/10.15083/000476049338bd1d-52d5-4cad-916e-0d15ffe828f0
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
pas015015.pdf (1.2 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-07-20 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 19世紀前半のノースカロライナ州に見る奴隷所有者の権利 : トマス・ラフィンが下した判決のテキストからの考察 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15083/00047604 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | The Extent of Slaveholder’s Rights in the Early 19th Century North Carolina : An Examination of Court Decisions Written by Thomas Ruffin | |||||
著者 |
児玉, 真希
× 児玉, 真希 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子 | 142774 | |||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
姓名 | KODAMA, MAKI | |||||
著者所属 | ||||||
著者所属 | 東京大学 | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | This is a study of two articles written by Thomas Ruffin, who was known to be a respectable Chief Justice of North Carolina State Supreme Court in the first half of nineteenth century. His infamous decision of State v. Mann declared in 1829 that “the power of the master must be absolute, to render the submission of the slave perfect.” This case granted slaveholders absolute power to rule over their slaves in possession. However ten years later in State v. Hoover, Ruffin modified his opinion towards slaveholders stating that they must not kill their slaves. Through a close analysis of these decisions, this article examines the reason why he limited the power of slaveholders. Previous studies suggest Ruffin’s opinion towards slaves changed because he developed a sense of humanism and demanded slaveholders to be more benign. However, these studies overlooked what was discussed in the lower county courts and the local matters which require attention. In State v. Mann, Ruffin overruled a county court’s decision influenced by his ideas about master and slave relationship. He stated that seeking mutual profit was the purpose of the relationship and the slaveholders must be granted with absolute power to secure such profit. However in State v. Hoover, the judge chose to affirm the county court judgment due to a lack of the defendant’s disposition to properly rule a slave. Though Ruffin’s did demonstrate a kind of humanism towards slaves, his decisions altogether strengthened popular pro-slavery arguments which proliferated in the antebellum South. | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 論文 | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Articles | |||||
書誌情報 |
アメリカ太平洋研究 = Pacific and American studies 巻 15, p. 200-217, 発行日 2015-03 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 13462989 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA11562201 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 東京大学大学院総合文化研究科附属グローバル地域研究機構アメリカ太平洋地域研究センター | |||||
出版者別名 | ||||||
Center for Pacific and American Studies, Institute for Advanced Global Studies, The University of Tokyo |