{"created":"2021-03-01T07:10:10.883001+00:00","id":49306,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"12917ffa-a83e-4827-8394-96725c272b43"},"_deposit":{"id":"49306","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"49306"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00049306","sets":["46:2942:7744","9:504:2944:7745"]},"item_4_alternative_title_1":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Discourses of Civilization and Culture in the Co-Construction of the Nation-State, Chinese, and Japanese Empires : Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Colonial Policy in Taiwan and Korea(2)"}]},"item_4_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2018-03","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"158","bibliographicPageStart":"71","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"173","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"東洋文化研究所紀要 = The memoirs of Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia"}]}]},"item_4_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Historical writings on China have long been constrained by a seemingly indisputable rupture between the periods of the Qing dynasty and the Chinese republic: Qing is examined as an empire, whether a regional despotic empire or, as in recent revisionist views, a colonial empire that is contemporaneous and compatible with its Western counterparts in global history; the Republic of China, meanwhile, particularly that after the consolidation of power by the Nationalist Government in the late 1920s, is studied exclusively through the nation-state framework. During the late nineteenth century, however, the Manchu dynasty, which had stretched far away into the non-sinographic terrains of Inner Asia, redefined itself in sinographic terms as zhongguo or the one and only Middle-Kingdom while refusing to be just another empire in the world; it was only after its defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War that the Qing court for the first time adopted the Japanese translation of empire diguo (Jp. teikoku), coupled with wenming (Jp. bunmei) or civilization, into the official lexicon. The dominant historiography, then, has left unquestioned the paradigmatic gap between zhongguo and diguo as well as the two ideas’ hegemonic struggle, which has lingered on in post-revolutionary Chinese discourse; furthermore, it hastily equates accomplishments of revolution with assertions of de-imperialization without attending to the more nuanced relationship between imperialism and nationalism in that same discourse.\n The present paper, which is the latter half of Chapter 2 in this serial article, re-interrogates the transition between the dynastic and republican regimes as the specific formation of a nation-empire, namely, the imperial formation characteristic of the age of the nation-state, as was explored in the first installment. Central to the analysis is the proposition that in that process the translated notions of civilization and culture were re-signified in the sinographic semantic field in a way that eventually articulated the discourse of anti-imperial culturalism. It is this discourse that enabled the new republic to authenticate itself as a legitimate victim of empire, whether as a semi-colony (ban zhimindi) or an even lower-ranked hypo-colony (ci zhimindi), in both cases thereby effectively denying and defying its deeply internalized imperiality. In order to trace the highly complicated process of this discursive formation over the course of a century, this installment is divided into three sections, on the late nineteenth century, the turn of the twentieth century, and the early republican era, respectively. The argument demonstrates that in each period the semantic equivalence in translation between jiaohua and civilization, jinhua and evolution, and wenhua and culture was foregrounded but re-signified by way of a sinographic play on signifiers; this re-signification, moreover, granted tonghua or assimilation positive value in dominant discourse. Hence the nascent nationempire was enabled to represent itself as a nation-state embracing the entirety of its subjects in the Chinese nation (zhonghua minzu), while undermining the idea of culture as a principle of difference and autonomy. The materials this text considers, among others, are late Qing policies towards Taiwan and Korea, Liang Qichao’s adaptation of “national imperialism” (minzu diguozhuyi), and Sun Yatsen’s advocacy of “royal-way culture” (wangdao wenhua).\n The concurrent formation of an empire that is mediated by the suppression of its very imperial self in culturalist terms strongly affected the workings and legitimacy of the Japanese empire and its colonial policies towards Taiwan and Korea. This study reexamines East Asian history in terms of the antagonistic but complicit ergence of regional empires so as to articulate a fresh critique of inter-imperial global modernity.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_4_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"146294","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"Yamauchi, Fumitaka"}]}]},"item_4_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.15083/00074430","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_4_publisher_20":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"東京大学東洋文化研究所"}]},"item_4_select_14":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_select_item":"publisher"}]},"item_4_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00170926","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"05638089 ","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_4_text_21":{"attribute_name":"出版者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"山内, 文登"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"146293","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-04-17"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"ioc173003.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"937.4 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"ioc173003.pdf","url":"https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/49306/files/ioc173003.pdf"},"version_id":"dbf0bd35-0012-41b2-9afc-091a2403b181"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"文明・文化言説と国民帝国・中華帝国・日本帝国 : 台湾・朝鮮の植民政策研究の理論的前進のために(2)","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"文明・文化言説と国民帝国・中華帝国・日本帝国 : 台湾・朝鮮の植民政策研究の理論的前進のために(2)"}]},"item_type_id":"4","owner":"1","path":["7744","7745"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2018-04-17"},"publish_date":"2018-04-17","publish_status":"0","recid":"49306","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["文明・文化言説と国民帝国・中華帝国・日本帝国 : 台湾・朝鮮の植民政策研究の理論的前進のために(2)"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":null},"updated":"2022-12-19T04:23:46.206360+00:00"}