ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 118 総合文化研究科・教養学部
  2. 40 国際社会科学専攻
  3. 相関社会科学
  4. 20
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 030 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. 相関社会科学
  4. 20

パスポート・レジームからみる国際秩序と世界秩序の連動 : 所有的個人主義、文化、そしてアイデンティティの確保

https://doi.org/10.15083/00017725
https://doi.org/10.15083/00017725
c00baadc-56c1-4889-9de4-88f019110a1f
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ssk020006.pdf ssk020006.pdf (614.6 kB)
アイテムタイプ 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1)
公開日 2012-04-27
タイトル
タイトル パスポート・レジームからみる国際秩序と世界秩序の連動 : 所有的個人主義、文化、そしてアイデンティティの確保
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ journal article
ID登録
ID登録 10.15083/00017725
ID登録タイプ JaLC
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Interlocking International Order and World Order through Passport Regime : Possessive Individualism, Culture, and Securitization of Identity
著者 前田, 幸男

× 前田, 幸男

WEKO 28551

前田, 幸男

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 28552
姓名 Maeda, Yukio
著者所属
著者所属 国際基督教大学社会科学研究所
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 In this paper, the relationship between the International Order and the World Order through passports is explained. It is based on the perspective that the international society is consisted not only from above but also from below. It is also reassessed in the paper that Hedley Bull focused on "order", in stark contrast to recent scholars of English School who mainly elaborate "society", not "order" at all. His analysis of order through protection of "life", "contracts" and "stability of possession", can be interpreted as maintenance of biopower for each nation. Alexander Wendt named it the "Lockean culture". However, he never explained the meaning of the term. The word of culture should be explained, rather than the tool for explanation. In the paper, therefore, it is tried to link "possessive individualism" as a deep structure to "passport" as a device to identify individuals in order to maintain both the international and world orders. Some states permit free international movement of individuals, others do not. Some nations are welcomed from other states, other nations are not. John Torpey rightly pointed out that passports were the tool for "the monopolization of the legitimate means of movement by modern states and state system". However, sovereign states with its "absolute power" cooperate with International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to strengthen the e-passport regime, only to (re)produce complex differentiation for hierarchy. EU also cooperates with ICAO to manage population through e-passports. The e-passports are, therefore, the tough dispositif with high performance for securitization of identity-cum-possessive individualism inside and outside the state's border. These international orders supported by passports cover not so much entire population on earth as targeted, governable, and specific people. Finally, I suggest that the multiple examinations between passports, birth certificates and liberalism as a further research topic are necessary in order to understand the international and world order complexes.
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 論文
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Papers
書誌情報 相関社会科学

巻 20, p. 71-87, 発行日 2011-03-03
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 09159312
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10181474
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 361
出版者
出版者 東京大学大学院総合文化研究科国際社会科学専攻
出版者別名
Department of Advanced Social and International Studies, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 11:16:52.697768
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3