WEKO3
アイテム
劉知幾の史学思想
https://doi.org/10.15083/0002003750
https://doi.org/10.15083/00020037505df705cb-11ad-41ca-bf05-36dde5372f19
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2022-04-22 | |||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||
タイトル | 劉知幾の史学思想 | |||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||
タイトル | Liu Zhiji’s Historiographical Thought | |||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
ID登録 | ||||||||||
ID登録 | 10.15083/0002003750 | |||||||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
著者 |
渡邉, 義浩
× 渡邉, 義浩
|
|||||||||
著者所属 | ||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
著者所属 | 早稲田大学文学学術院 | |||||||||
抄録 | ||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
内容記述 | The historiographical thought to which Liu Zhiji 劉知幾 gave expression in the Shitong 史通 was characterized by an emphasis on “straight writing”(zhishu 直書) and the rejection of “strange reports”(yiwen 異聞). / Liu Zhiji’s “straight writing” was not the sort of “straight writing” that also deferred to power-holders, as in the case of the Gongyang 公羊 school of interpretation of the Chunqiu 春秋, but was rather a form of “straight writing” that did not avoid mentioning their wrongdoing, a stance that was based on the Chunqiu Zuoshi zhuan 春秋左氏傳 and the commentary by Du Yu 杜預. This was because Liu Zhiji regarded the Chunqiu as the source of historical writing and believed that the canonical text of the Chunqiu was able to convey the facts correctly only with the appearance of the Zuoshi zhuan by Zuo Qiuming 左丘明, to whom Confucius had entrusted such matters. However, Liu Zhiji was aware that this type of “straight writing” was difficult to achieve and that such thinking was an exception in Confucian canonical scholarship. That he nonetheless attached importance to “straight writing” was because he himself narrowed the scope of source criticism based on “strange reports” established by Pei Songzhi 裴松之, who wrote a commentary on the Sanguozhi 三國志. / So long as ideas based on the Weishu 緯書, the publication of which had been banned during the Sui, were recorded in canonical and historical works, Liu Zhiji did not consider them to be “strange reports” that ought to be rejected. But he harshly criticized as “non-canonical” “strange reports” other than those in canonical works that the Tang had officially sanctioned in the Wujing zhengyi 五經 正義 or in historical works that the Tang had compiled as official histories. The reason that Liu Zhiji harshly criticized the Jinshu 晉書, which had been compiled by order of Taizong 太宗 by the History Bureau to which Liu Zhiji had himself formerly belonged was that its source works were based on “non-canonical” “strange reports.” / Liu Zhiji thus shut down the potential of the methodology of source criticism that, in an attempt to draw closer to the truth, also collected as “strange reports” sources circulating among the general populace and criticized sources that had been distorted under pressure from state authorities, a potential that Pei Songzhi’s source criticism had possessed. This could be described as a form of historiographical thought that was far removed from the modern Western historiography advocated by Ranke. | |||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 東洋文化研究所紀要 en : The memoirs of Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia 巻 180, p. 133-160, 発行日 2022-02-28 |
|||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||
収録物識別子 | 05638089 | |||||||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
収録物識別子 | AN00170926 | |||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
出版者 | 東京大学東洋文化研究所 | |||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||
出版者 | Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo |