ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 132 東洋文化研究所
  2. 東洋文化研究所紀要
  3. 155
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. 東洋文化研究所紀要
  4. 155

11世紀の日本における送金為替手形の問題について

https://doi.org/10.15083/00026929
https://doi.org/10.15083/00026929
3259cc9b-aee9-48e8-92ec-1120050a60d3
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ioc115004.pdf ioc115004.pdf (967.7 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2009-04-14
タイトル
タイトル 11世紀の日本における送金為替手形の問題について
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15083/00026929
ID登録タイプ JaLC
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル A study of bill of exchanges for remittance in 11th century Japan
著者 井上, 正夫

× 井上, 正夫

WEKO 119538

井上, 正夫

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 119539
姓名 Inoue, Masao
著者所属
著者所属 京都大学
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This study examines two major theories regarding the origins of the Japanese concept of the “bill of exchange”. The first argues that this concept formulated during the “Heian” period (11th century); while the other, the “Kamakura” theory, argues for a later period (13th century) when merchants began to formally manage documents which, up to that point, had lacked sufficient transferability. “Kudashibumi” and “Henshou” documents which explicitly state that “drawers could consign payment to payers” in the 11th century could be linguistically defined as bills of exchange. Though the Heian theory regards these documents as a “means of payment”, it doesn't address whether a “means of remittance” occurred in these documents or not. In contrast, the Kamakura theory argues that these two documents served only as “orders for payment”, emphasizing that these documents were not always regarded as a bill of exchange because of their limited transferability and circulation. Thus, there were no crucial differences between the two major theories, just a difference in the extent of their definition of what constituted a bill of exchange. In this analysis, several historical documents from the Todai Temple indicate that Shinanozenji used a Henshou document addressed to the Suou provincial branch in Kyoto from the Todai Temple in order to convert clothes from Otsu into rice in Kyoto. This fact means that the Henshou worked as a bill of exchange for remittance. The document evolved characteristically to become more neutral and transferable as verbal agreements grew to also require an Ukebumi receipt. These findings weaken the Kamakura theory, and at the same time, advocate that the Heian theory which regarded Henshou only as a relevant document for collecting taxes contractually should be revised. Furthermore, more historical materials with Henshou documents showing the occurrence of contracts need to be re-examined.
書誌情報 東洋文化研究所紀要

巻 155, p. 133-169, 発行日 2009-03-27
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 05638089
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00170928
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 051.1
出版者
出版者 東京大学東洋文化研究所
出版者別名
The Institute of Oriental Culture The University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 11:49:48.150030
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3