WEKO3
アイテム
中国における「新史学」の形成と近代
https://doi.org/10.15083/00026953
https://doi.org/10.15083/00026953e4f84e3f-1c8b-4e1f-a2ae-95ade50afa50
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ioc152005.pdf (896.9 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-01-13 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 中国における「新史学」の形成と近代 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00026953 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Modernity and the Formation of New History Writing in China | |||||
| 著者 |
喬, 志航
× 喬, 志航 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 119573 | |||||
| 姓名 | Qiao, Zhihang | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | In 1902, Liang Qichao who was in exile in Japan, published an essay called “New History Writing” in The New Citizen Journal (Xinmin congbao). In this essay, he adamantly promoted a “revolution in history” and in this way “New History Writing” entered the stage of Chinese history. There are many works on “New History Writing,” but these works usually either stop at summarizing the contents of individuals who are considered to be practitioners of “New History Writing” or attempt to understand New History Writing through a perspective that presupposes a binary opposition between the new and the old. These writings do not look at the goal of New History Writing or into the various conditions that gave rise to New History Writing, conditions which lie concealed beneath New History Writing’s idea of a historical methodology that stresses the development of an objective narrative based on an accumulation of facts. In this article, I would like to explore the formation and development of New History Writing through looking at three historians who were representative of New History Writing in various periods, namely Liang Qichao, Hu Shi and Guo Moruo. Moreover, I would like to make clear their interrelationships and their scholarly characteristics. However, I am not concerned to conduct a detailed and exhaustive study of their writings. Rather, I shall enter my study of New History Writing through examining the relationship between these author’s works and modernity. In other words, I take New History Writing as a topic in intellectual history. This means that because New History Writing is conditioned and shaped by its intellectual and political context, important clues to understand New History Writing stem from grasping the trajectory of modern Chinese thought.viIn this way, rather than presupposing the distinction between old and new or the methodology of seeking objective truth, I would like to see such conceptual maneuvers as grounded in the transformations of modernity. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
東洋文化研究所紀要 巻 152, p. 171-283, 発行日 2007-12-19 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 05638089 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00170928 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 051.1 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学東洋文化研究所 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| 値 | The Institute of Oriental Culture The University of Tokyo | |||||
