WEKO3
アイテム
兪吉濬の近代国家観
https://doi.org/10.15083/00027088
https://doi.org/10.15083/0002708873b3fbf0-d5e7-451f-870c-fa5f2d036575
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ioc13607.pdf (1.4 MB)
|
|
|
|
ioc13607a.pdf (57.0 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-11-29 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 兪吉濬の近代国家観 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00027088 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Yu Kil-jun (兪吉濬)'s Perception of the Modern State | |||||
| 著者 |
金, 鳳珍
× 金, 鳳珍 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 59611 | |||||
| 姓名 | Kim, Bong-jin | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | In Yu Kil-jun's enlightenment thought, traditon coexists with modernity.But we cannot say that his thought is a simple mixture of tradition and modernity.Both of them raise chemical reactions with each other in his thought, and produce a new kind of modernity or tradition.So we have to find out about ‘the new product’ in his view of the modern state.Not by prescribing that tradition is conservative, particular or wrong; nor that modernity is progressive, universal or right, but by understanding that both of them have their own values from which each could learn from the other.Bearing this in mind, I will consider Yu Kil-jun's perception of the modern state which appears throughout his writings, particularly in Sŏyu-kyŏnmun (『西遊見聞』).This subject is divided into four arguments looking at the national, the people's, and the monarch's rights and the constitutional monarchy.Before dealing with these arguments, in relation to these, his theory of civilization is examined first.His perception of the modern state as his theory of civilization is characterized by aspects of relativism, mutualism, and moralism which are based on neo-Confucianism, i. e. traditional thought rather than modern Western thought.That is, in the process of the introduction of modern thought he intended not only to comply with its strengths on the one hand, but also to keep its defects out of the good points in traditional thought as a matter of course.With regard to this, some may think that he has a ‘conservative, premodern or anachronistic’ way of thinking.Certainly it could be judged in this way in accordance with the modern period when modern Western thought was the only standard for evaluation.But nowadays, when we are about to enter the 21st century and are talking about post-modernity, in my judgment, his thought has to be re-evaluated.It could be argued that there is a form of post-modernity trying to surface in his thought. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
東洋文化研究所紀要 巻 136, p. (89)-(114), 発行日 1998-12 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 05638089 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00170926 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 051.1 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学東洋文化研究所 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| 値 | The Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo | |||||
