ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 132 東洋文化研究所
  2. 東洋文化研究所紀要
  3. 123
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. 東洋文化研究所紀要
  4. 123

ガンダーラ彫刻と阿弥陀仏

https://doi.org/10.15083/00027135
https://doi.org/10.15083/00027135
f92ee9a0-8e4b-43a2-aa51-733fc2e69c80
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ioc12303.pdf ioc12303.pdf (2.2 MB)
ioc12303a.pdf ioc12303a.pdf (56.0 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2006-07-26
タイトル
タイトル ガンダーラ彫刻と阿弥陀仏
言語
言語 jpn
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 ガンダーラ
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 仏像
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15083/00027135
ID登録タイプ JaLC
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル On Amida-Buddha Statutes in the Gandharan Sculpture
著者 岩松, 浅夫

× 岩松, 浅夫

WEKO 59703

岩松, 浅夫

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 59704
姓名 Iwamatsu, Asao
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 It has long been said (and generally accepted) that no traces of Amida-Buddha (Amitāyus or Amitābha in Sanskrit) belief or cult had not been found in India itself, in spite of the origination of this belief or cult in that country-especially in North-Western region including Gandhara (and Taxila)-being apparant.
About ten or twenty years ago two Gandharan-styled statues were made public separately, one in 1973 by Dr. J. C. Harle and the other in 1982 by Prof. J. Brough.
Each of them seems, at least to the present auther, to have much significance in the above-mentioned problem of the evidence of the Amida-Buddha belief or cult in India; for the former statue contains in it a Bodhisattva figure in whose turban-shaped crown is sitting a small Buddha in meditation or dhyāna pose (see fig. 3), and the latter has in its pedestal an inscription in which is found the word ‘amridaha’ as the name of the Buddha (as to the latter statue, see fig. 4).
With regard to these statues comments or mentions have been done by some scholars, yet any of them does not seem wholly satisfactory.
Then, here the present auther tries some consideration to these two statues apart from such opinions; and through it he comes to a conclusion of his own, which supposes not only that either of these two was made as an Amida-Buddha triad (or quintet) but also that most of the similar-shaped statues which have been thought of by A. Foucher (and other scholars after him) as those of the ‘Great Miracle at Crâvastî’ might have been the same, that is, those of Amida-Buddha triad (or quintet, or of his paradise Sukhāvatī: for example, see fig. 1).
In addition to this, he surmises consequently that this North-Western region-including Gandhara and Taxila-where flourished the so-called Gandharan Art for several centuries A. D. must have been the main center of the Amida-Buddha belief or cult in India until at the earliest fourth or fifth century A. D.
書誌情報 東洋文化研究所紀要

巻 123, p. 209-246, 発行日 1994-02
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 05638089
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00170926
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 186.8
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 718
出版者
出版者 東京大学東洋文化研究所
出版者別名
The Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 11:44:29.889101
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3