WEKO3
アイテム
後期オスマン帝国における没落観と改革論
https://doi.org/10.15083/00027150
https://doi.org/10.15083/00027150a28da1fb-7c77-4e54-a438-6ae9ca5bf3f5
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ioc11804.pdf (3.3 MB)
|
|
|
|
ioc11804a.pdf (126.5 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2006-07-26 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 後期オスマン帝国における没落観と改革論 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | オスマン帝国 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00027150 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Ottoman View of Decline and Reform in the Post-Classical Age : 1574～1789 | |||||
| 著者 |
鈴木, 董
× 鈴木, 董 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 59734 | |||||
| 姓名 | Suzuki, Tadashi | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Decline and reform of the empire had been the most common subjects of the ottoman authors in the later Imperial Age. In the genre of “Siyasetname” or “Nasihatname”, the members of the Ottoman ruling organization presented their observations and diagnosis of their own organization. Here I will try to analyse the major examples of Ottoman siyasetname from the middle of the sixteenth century till the end of the eighteenth century. In the reign of Suleyman the Magnificent which later authors remembered as the Golden Age of the Ottoman Empire, contemporary authors had optimistic view of their future. Ibn Isa Saruhanî in his Rvmuz ül-Künuz, a book of an apocatislic vision, predicted that the Ottaman State should survive even after the second millenium of Hicrî. The complaints of Lutfî Paşa in his Asafname were about the temporary abuses which could be removed rather easily. However the basic tone of authors changed. During the period of Murad III and Mehmed III, such authors as Gelibolulu Ali, Mustafa Selanikî and the anonimous author of Hirz ül-Müluk expresed their anxieties about the future of their empire. In the reign of Ahmed I, many people felt that something was wrong about the imperial system and organization since the age of Murad III. Veysî wrote his compendium of the analysis of the causes of decline and fall of dynasties. Ayn-1 Ali, the anonimous anther of Kavanin-i Yeniçeriyan and others tried to present the ideal form of the imperial government in their efforts to compile the Kanunnames of various parts of the ruling organization. A little later, the auther of Kitab-i Müstetab wrote his severe diagnosis of the present state of the Ottoman Empire. According to him, corruption opened the path to confusion, “ruşvetile verdi âleme ihtilâl”. After the failure of the prematured reform of Osman II, in the reign of Murad IV, Koçi Bey presented his famous political tract Koçi Bey Risalesi to Sultan Murad. In his booklet, Koçi Bey analysed the present situation and the causes of confusion and proposed remedies. Actually Murad IV took severe measures in order to reform, though only half successfully. After then, in the early period of the reign of Mehmed IV, Kâtip Çelebi analysed the total situation with so much theoretical skill in his Dustur ul-Amel and expected the appearance of the owener of the sword “sabib-i seyif” as a powerful reformer. His hope was fulfilled by the reforming vezirs of Köprülü family. However the fruits of Köprülü Reform had been lost after the decisive failure of the second siege of Vienna, succeeding defeats during the prolonged war. The tide had turned after the conclusion of the treaty of Carlowitz in 1699. The power ballance between the Ottoman Empire and Europe moved in advantage of the latter. The treaty of Passarowitz was the further blow. Gradually the Ottomans compelled to abandon their age-old “cihad” policy and took a new peaceful policy. The representative of this new policy was Nevsehirli Ibrahim Paşa, the originator of the Tulip Age “Lâle Devri”. Even after this great change of tide, in the world of siyasetname, the main trend was in the traditional line. Sincere diagnosis of the present situation and proposals of reform such as Mustafa Naima's introduction to his chronicle, Tarih-i Naima, Defterdar Sari Mehmed Paşa's Nasayih ül-Vüzera ve Ümera or Canikli Ali Paşa's Tedabir-i Gazavat were examples of this trend. Only such a marginal man as Ibrahim Müteferrika, who was a new convert to Islam of Hungarian origin, could propose a quite new alternative to re-estimate and adopt new western military technology and organization. In the practical world of politics, during the eighteenth century actually the procees of reform in the way of adaption of Western methods of organization and military technology began and proceeded slowly and slowly through the political struggle between the enlighted party and the conservatives. Only the accession of Selim III opened the door toward the new age of reform and systematic adaption of new Western civilization. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
東洋文化研究所紀要 巻 118, p. 193-265, 発行日 1992-03 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 05638089 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00170926 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 239.6 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学東洋文化研究所 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| 値 | The Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo | |||||
