WEKO3
アイテム
人類学における記述対象の限定について : 社会と文化の存在様相に関する考察とモデル(1)
https://doi.org/10.15083/00027245
https://doi.org/10.15083/00027245b9ee9da2-08d4-4401-8096-9723ba656dc3
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ioc09709.pdf (1.2 MB)
|
|
|
|
ioc09709a.pdf (56.8 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2008-06-06 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 人類学における記述対象の限定について : 社会と文化の存在様相に関する考察とモデル(1) | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00027245 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Defining the Subject of Anthropological Studies : Models of Societies and Cultures (1) | |||||
| 著者 |
船曳, 建夫
× 船曳, 建夫 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 119690 | |||||
| 姓名 | Funabiki, Takeo | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | In the fifty years which has elapsed since the publication of the works by Malinowski (1922) and Radcliffe-Brown (1922), socio-cultural anthropology has shifted its attention from the small-scale, simple society to the larger and more complex social systems.But ‘primitive isolates’ which were the foundation in beginning social anthropology [Redfield, 1955: 25], are still regarded as presenting the standard research subject.In describing a complex society, ethnographers present it as a natural unit of pepople having a clear-cut boundary and a distinct culture.This tendency is due to their preference and their efforts to make the subject of their studies conform with the classical case of the primitive society, in which ‘people’,‘society’ and ‘culture’ all appear to have identical boundaries and to form a unitary set of three-in-one.In a complex society, however, people, society and culture rarely coincide in its boundary and each one depends on the others for its definition: a given culture is defined as culture P because people P have this culture, and these people are P because of their social membership of society P, but society P cannot be defined without reference to culture P, and so on.In the first section of this paper, I clarify the relationships of the three subjects of anthropological study: people, culture and society.I also explain that ‘land’, a fourth factor, plays an essential role in defining the three subjects as if they formed a natural autonomous whole.I throw doubt, in the second section, on the assumed conformity of people, society and culture in the ethnographical archetype, the primitive isolates.I take the case of the Mbotgote, an ‘isolated’ people of Malekula Island in the New Hebrides Archipelago, to examine how a primitive society or culture is created and acknowledged in anthropological literature.In the last section, I make some concluding remarkes on the function of ‘land’ in the anthropological description, and on the historical change in the boundaries of the Mbotgote. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
東洋文化研究所紀要 巻 97, p. (80)-(55), 発行日 1985-03 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 05638089 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00170926 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 051.1 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学東洋文化研究所 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| The Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo | ||||||
