WEKO3
アイテム
古典ヒンドゥー法の家産分割規定
https://doi.org/10.15083/00027376
https://doi.org/10.15083/00027376d3e1229d-a2f7-4446-9b3a-f9d04da0e4f4
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ioc01204.pdf (2.7 MB)
|
|
|
|
ioc01204a.pdf (71.8 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2006-07-26 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 古典ヒンドゥー法の家産分割規定 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | ヒンズー教 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 財産相続 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00027376 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | On the Dāyabhāaga in Classical Hindu Law | |||||
| 著者 |
山崎, 利男
× 山崎, 利男 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 60177 | |||||
| 姓名 | Yamazaki, Toshio | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The term “Classical Hindu law” refers to the legal regulations recorded in the Dharmaśāstra, which was written some time during or prior to the eighth century. The history of the development of this law may be divided into the three following periods. 1. Period of the Dharmasutras 2. Period of Manu, Yājñavalkya, Visnu, and Śankha-Likhita 3. Period of Nārada, Brhaspati, Kātyāyana, Vyāsa, etc. In the Dāyabhāaga, the father was recognized as the head of the family. In the first period the father had legal possession of practically all his family's property except the strīdhana, but in the second and third periods possession of private property by other members of the family was recognized in certain cases, and such property was clearly distinguished from family property. Accordingly, in the case of debts or obligations according to family property, the entire family was responsible, whereas in the case of those accruing to private property only the individual owner was responsible. The males in a family each was entitled to a share of the family property, and a son could in principle take his share and set up an independent household. This was even done while the father was still alive, but in such cases the father's permission was necessary, and the father decided the amount the son was to receive. The father's authority ceased with his death, and family property was simply divided among the male survivors, unless, of course, the family remained intact under the leadership of a new patriarch. The successor to the patriarch had to be a male. (In the second and third periods wives or daughters were recognized as successors to the patriarch, but this is a problem which must be dealt with in more detail in a future article.) In principle, each male heir had an equal share of the family property, but it is also recorded that the eldest son had priority. Uddhāra was rare after the Code of Manu. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
東洋文化研究所紀要 巻 12, p. 107-160, 発行日 1957-03 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 05638089 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00170926 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 225.03 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 324.69 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学東洋文化研究所 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| The Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo | ||||||
