WEKO3
アイテム
「シンボリック・アーケオロジー」の射程 : 1980年代の考古学の行方
https://doi.org/10.15083/00029666
https://doi.org/10.15083/000296664928a27b-7cae-4a1a-90ab-05d5c5dfe46d
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00004312265.pdf (1.3 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2007-03-30 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 「シンボリック・アーケオロジー」の射程 : 1980年代の考古学の行方 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00029666 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Symbolic Archaeology : A New Vista for the 1980's | |||||
| 著者 |
後藤, 明
× 後藤, 明 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 65021 | |||||
| 姓名 | Goto, Akira | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | 東京大学文学部考古学研究室 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Over the past 20 years, "new archaeology" based on a view of culture as an adaptive device, has contributed to the advancement of functional and evolutionary-ecological methods in the f field. But at the beginning of the 1980's there seems to be a reaction to what is now percieved as an over-emphasis on the material, behavioral or functional aspects of culture. Several papers by Hodder and his students (Hodder 1982), and a recent paper by Leone (1982), argue that we should reevaluate the importance of the mental and symbolic aspects of man, and the historical context of culture. These archaeologists seem to share several assumptions: that all objects in a culture are equally important in regard to overall organi-zation of that culture, and that all objects are shaped by a fundamentally mental structure (as well as primary use) which shapes social organization, myth, etc.. Some of them are more specifically concerned with structural analysis of archaeological materials and adopt its analytical criteria such as syntagmatic and paradigmatic relationships, binary opposition, etc.. Recently some Japanese archaeologists have also tried to reconstruct prehistoric social orga-nization and cosmology on the basis of several kinds of materials such as mortuary practice, settlement form, pottery decoration, etc.. This symbolic approach in archaeology, or "symbolic archaeology", will contribute to the construction of a holistic perspective in the archaeological study of man and culture. I-iow-ever, there are certain problems in the use of this approach as a research methodology. One problem is that the relationship between the symbolic/ideological aspect and the behavioral/ecological, aspect of a culture is very debatable. Each archaeologist interested in this approach should clarify his position (eg. Cultural Meterialism, Marxist Perspective, etc.) Another problem is how to test the validity of a symbolic structure and how to inquire into actual social relationships which, according to some archaeologists, are often misrepre-sented by the symbolic aspects of material culture. Third problem is how to introduce atemporal theory (eg. Levi-Strauss's structuralism) to archaeology which is essentially a. diachronic discipline, without following "Pompeii premise" (Binford 1981). Though "symbolic archaeology" has, several problems, it is my conclusion that the recent proposal for use of symbolic approach presents a stimulating new vista for archaeologists who are seeking more comprehensive theory and method in the study of culture. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
東京大学文学部考古学研究室研究紀要 巻 2, p. 293-309, 発行日 1983-08-16 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02873850 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00340298 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 202.5 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学文学部考古学研究室 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| The Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Letters, the University of Tokyo | ||||||
