ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 114 人文社会系研究科・文学部
  2. 10 宗教学・宗教史学研究室
  3. 東京大学宗教学年報
  4. 30
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. 東京大学宗教学年報
  4. 30

複数性と排除 : 「他者なき他者」の世界を生きるために

http://hdl.handle.net/2261/55332
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/55332
b08c5a0d-8d31-455d-bc9c-0ce797ac21c0
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
rel030010.pdf rel030010.pdf (363.9 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2013-08-20
タイトル
タイトル 複数性と排除 : 「他者なき他者」の世界を生きるために
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Plurality and Exclusion : Surviving in the World of “Others without sensibility toward Others”
著者 磯前, 順一

× 磯前, 順一

WEKO 66801

磯前, 順一

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 66802
姓名 Isomae, Jun'ichi
著者所属
著者所属 国際日本文化研究センター
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Postcolonial criticism has problematized the discourse of repressing and excluding others. Postcolonial critics, such as Homi Bhabha and Edward Said, criticize the homogeneity of identity through which individual and national identity have been constructed. They, instead, propose that identity is originally impure, hybrid and without authenticity. The recognition of hybrid subjectivity leads us to form the society of “commensurability of the incommensurable” in the web of human relations. Society, however, is constituted of plurality. As Hanna Arendt stated, plurality necessarily accompanies with the exclusion of others: minority, immigrant, woman and discriminated ethnicity. Plurality does not mean equality but the unevenness of different subjects. From this perspective, the postcolonial idea about “commensurability of the incommensurable” cannot help but insist on the ideal ethic that is distinguished from the reality of our everyday life. At this point Gayatri Spivak’s famous statement that “subaltern cannot speak” is worth considering. The terminology of “Subaltern” means the conspiratorial structure of plurality and exclusion. Such exclusion has been called “the primitive violence” according to Jacque Derrida. Here we are requested for our “hospitality” as “the experience of the impossible.” However, we should recognize the existence of “others without sensibility toward others’ pain,” regardless of which kind of ethics we envision. Needless to say, it is obvious that the public sphere accompanies with exclusion both in negative or positive senses. At the same time the private sphere is embraced by the darkness of our heart. It is the task of contemporary intellectuals to think about how to shed lights of public reason on this dark sphere of emotion. Because of the inseparable relationship between religion and politics, people cannot separate the public and private spheres as Giorgio Agamben pointed out. To articulate the relationship of public and private spheres is the task that we should take on urgently. We should recognize that the reality of everyday life is always elusive from our intellectual grasp of the reality.
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 研究ノート/Research Note
書誌情報 東京大学宗教学年報

巻 30, p. 155-166, 発行日 2013-03-31
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 02896400
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10032645
出版者
出版者 東京大学文学部宗教学研究室
出版者別名
Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-02 02:57:07.440712
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3