WEKO3
アイテム
複数性と排除 : 「他者なき他者」の世界を生きるために
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/55332
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/55332b08c5a0d-8d31-455d-bc9c-0ce797ac21c0
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
rel030010.pdf (363.9 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2013-08-20 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 複数性と排除 : 「他者なき他者」の世界を生きるために | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Plurality and Exclusion : Surviving in the World of “Others without sensibility toward Others” | |||||
| 著者 |
磯前, 順一
× 磯前, 順一 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 66802 | |||||
| 姓名 | Isomae, Jun'ichi | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | 国際日本文化研究センター | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Postcolonial criticism has problematized the discourse of repressing and excluding others. Postcolonial critics, such as Homi Bhabha and Edward Said, criticize the homogeneity of identity through which individual and national identity have been constructed. They, instead, propose that identity is originally impure, hybrid and without authenticity. The recognition of hybrid subjectivity leads us to form the society of “commensurability of the incommensurable” in the web of human relations. Society, however, is constituted of plurality. As Hanna Arendt stated, plurality necessarily accompanies with the exclusion of others: minority, immigrant, woman and discriminated ethnicity. Plurality does not mean equality but the unevenness of different subjects. From this perspective, the postcolonial idea about “commensurability of the incommensurable” cannot help but insist on the ideal ethic that is distinguished from the reality of our everyday life. At this point Gayatri Spivak’s famous statement that “subaltern cannot speak” is worth considering. The terminology of “Subaltern” means the conspiratorial structure of plurality and exclusion. Such exclusion has been called “the primitive violence” according to Jacque Derrida. Here we are requested for our “hospitality” as “the experience of the impossible.” However, we should recognize the existence of “others without sensibility toward others’ pain,” regardless of which kind of ethics we envision. Needless to say, it is obvious that the public sphere accompanies with exclusion both in negative or positive senses. At the same time the private sphere is embraced by the darkness of our heart. It is the task of contemporary intellectuals to think about how to shed lights of public reason on this dark sphere of emotion. Because of the inseparable relationship between religion and politics, people cannot separate the public and private spheres as Giorgio Agamben pointed out. To articulate the relationship of public and private spheres is the task that we should take on urgently. We should recognize that the reality of everyday life is always elusive from our intellectual grasp of the reality. | |||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 研究ノート/Research Note | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
東京大学宗教学年報 巻 30, p. 155-166, 発行日 2013-03-31 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02896400 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10032645 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学文学部宗教学研究室 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo | ||||||
