ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 114 人文社会系研究科・文学部
  2. 10 宗教学・宗教史学研究室
  3. 東京大学宗教学年報
  4. 25
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. 東京大学宗教学年報
  4. 25

宗教学的生命倫理研究のための素描(下) : 私論

https://doi.org/10.15083/00030495
https://doi.org/10.15083/00030495
08a63e94-6061-4150-aa3e-9f7f5d7379e6
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
rel02502.pdf rel02502.pdf (1.8 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2011-10-13
タイトル
タイトル 宗教学的生命倫理研究のための素描(下) : 私論
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15083/00030495
ID登録タイプ JaLC
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Constructing a Bioethical Study from the Viewpoint of Religious Studies (Part Two) : Rudimentary and Personal Plans
著者 池澤, 優

× 池澤, 優

WEKO 66942

池澤, 優

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 66943
姓名 IKEZAWA, Masaru
著者所属
著者所属 東京大学
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 In Part One of this article, the principal logics of bioethics were classified into three types : "standard bioethics," "the normative images of humans and nature," and "the concept of human relatedness." There are general tendencies that each logic is prominent in specific cultures, but different logics can also coexist in a given culture, so it is impossible to think that cultural differences produce different logics in bioethics. What then do the so-called "cultural differences in bioethical discourses" express? This question is the primary focus of Part Two. When Gerald McKenny discusses the origins of "standard bioethics," he points out that it is based on the Modern world-view, that is, the idea that humans should be liberated from natural necessity and destiny by using technologies, which he calls "Bacomian project." Because the "standard bioethics" is the "verbalization" of this Modern world-view, the modem person would find it persuasive. Tristram Engelhardt asserts that each community or religion can create an alternative discourse of bioethics, which can replace standard bioethics, if it can "verbalize" its vague sensitivities. He thinks that standard bioethics is "contentless," and that "content-ful" ethics are brought about only by particular communities or religions. Their discussions suggest that all bioethical discourses are the result of "verbalizing" some cultural heritage or religion. If so, how are cultural heritages or religious traditions "verbalized"? In order to clarify the process of "verbalization," a book whose title is Confucian Bioethics is dealt with as a case study. The editor and authors of the book try to construct an alternative bioethical discourse, in opposition to standard bioethics, by verbalizing the Confucian tradition in China. The "verbalization" process in this book can be summarized as follows; first, the authors attribute standard bioethics to the Western or Christian way of thinking, and point out that it is not universal but culturally conditioned. The fact that there were various elements in the Western tradition is neglected. Second, the authors think Confucianism to be opposite to the Western way of thinking, and emphasize or sift out the unique elements from Confucianism. In this process, the variety of Confucianism, which includes many elements resembling those in Western traditions, is neglected. Third, these unique or alternative elements of Confucianism are expressed in modern Western concepts. From this case study it is found that the "verbalization" of Confucianism is not traditional Confucianism itself ; it is a re-interpretation, reformation, or even creation of Confucianism. This is what the human beings have done for thousands of years. In the midst of changing circumstances, they have faced and interpreted traditions, thence creating new elements and overcoming the situation. Bioethics is the field where new kinds of world-views or religiosities are being created. Thus, we can conclude what religious studies should do to bioethical studies ; to observe and describe the various interpretations of traditional cultures and religions in the process of "verbalization," while placing no absolute trust in any of them.
書誌情報 東京大学宗教学年報

巻 25, p. 13-29, 発行日 2008-03-31
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 02896400
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 160
出版者
出版者 東京大学文学部宗教学研究室
出版者別名
Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 15:03:20.656217
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3