WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "7b23fe74-6d6e-4c04-9b17-289fa9f510f9"}, "_deposit": {"id": "30605", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "30605"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00030605", "sets": ["4194", "4193"]}, "item_4_alternative_title_1": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "A Critical Examination of P. L. Berger\u0027s Secularization Theory"}]}, "item_4_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1999-03-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "106", "bibliographicPageStart": "97", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "16", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "東京大学宗教学年報"}]}]}, "item_4_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "P. L. Berger is identified as a typical advocate of linear secularization theory. Berger is considered as one of the phenomenological sociologists who stress the importance of individual activity. His secularization theory, however, posits an irreversible course of history that is not compatible with the tenets of phenomenological sociology. This paper inquires into the cause of this contradiction, and argues that the main problem of Berger\u0027s secularization theory is a confusion of \"religion\" and \"legitimation.\" Berger defines the concept of legitimation as socially objected knowledge that serves to explain and justify the social order. Legitimation is, therefore, a reality experienced by the members of a society. Although Berger describes four levels of legitimization, he makes use only of the fourth level (symbolic universe). Religion is defined as a part of legitimation, but in his use of \"religion\" all four levels of legitimation are implied. As a result of this confusion, religion, legitimation, and reality are all regarded as the same superstructure (Uberbau) influenced by a substructure (Unterbau).", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_4_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "67147", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "SUMIKA, Masayoshi"}]}]}, "item_4_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.15083/00030596", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_4_publisher_20": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "東京大学文学部宗教学研究室"}]}, "item_4_source_id_8": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "02896400", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_4_subject_15": {"attribute_name": "日本十進分類法", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "160", "subitem_subject_scheme": "NDC"}]}, "item_4_text_21": {"attribute_name": "出版者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo"}]}, "item_4_text_34": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Departmental Bulletin Paper"}]}, "item_4_text_4": {"attribute_name": "著者所属", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "東京大学大学院博士課程"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "住家, 正芳"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "67146", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-06-12"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "rel01607.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.0 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1000000.0, "url": {"label": "rel01607.pdf", "url": "https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/30605/files/rel01607.pdf"}, "version_id": "a786cf8b-7568-4370-a5fc-0a8a68a6e59a"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "P・L・バーガー世俗化論の批判的検討", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "P・L・バーガー世俗化論の批判的検討"}]}, "item_type_id": "4", "owner": "1", "path": ["4194", "4193"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.15083/00030596", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2011-10-13"}, "publish_date": "2011-10-13", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "30605", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["P・L・バーガー世俗化論の批判的検討"], "weko_shared_id": null}
P・L・バーガー世俗化論の批判的検討
https://doi.org/10.15083/00030596
https://doi.org/10.15083/000305961d956157-9fc6-4d41-b29a-c0d3005398d3
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
rel01607.pdf (1.0 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2011-10-13 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | P・L・バーガー世俗化論の批判的検討 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15083/00030596 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | A Critical Examination of P. L. Berger's Secularization Theory | |||||
著者 |
住家, 正芳
× 住家, 正芳 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子 | 67147 | |||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
姓名 | SUMIKA, Masayoshi | |||||
著者所属 | ||||||
著者所属 | 東京大学大学院博士課程 | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | P. L. Berger is identified as a typical advocate of linear secularization theory. Berger is considered as one of the phenomenological sociologists who stress the importance of individual activity. His secularization theory, however, posits an irreversible course of history that is not compatible with the tenets of phenomenological sociology. This paper inquires into the cause of this contradiction, and argues that the main problem of Berger's secularization theory is a confusion of "religion" and "legitimation." Berger defines the concept of legitimation as socially objected knowledge that serves to explain and justify the social order. Legitimation is, therefore, a reality experienced by the members of a society. Although Berger describes four levels of legitimization, he makes use only of the fourth level (symbolic universe). Religion is defined as a part of legitimation, but in his use of "religion" all four levels of legitimation are implied. As a result of this confusion, religion, legitimation, and reality are all regarded as the same superstructure (Uberbau) influenced by a substructure (Unterbau). | |||||
書誌情報 |
東京大学宗教学年報 巻 16, p. 97-106, 発行日 1999-03-31 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 02896400 | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題 | 160 | |||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 東京大学文学部宗教学研究室 | |||||
出版者別名 | ||||||
Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo |