WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "6e42742b-d5ee-4c8a-bcc5-4bd0e73e715e"}, "_deposit": {"id": "30609", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "30609"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00030609", "sets": ["4196", "4195"]}, "item_4_alternative_title_1": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "Secularization Theory in the 1990s : Dead-ends and Possibilities"}]}, "item_4_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1998-03-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "43", "bibliographicPageStart": "27", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "15", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "東京大学宗教学年報"}]}]}, "item_4_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "In the 1980s many scholars of religion admitted that the debate over secularization had come in an impasse. By that time the secularization thesis had generated a multitude of criticisms, but most critics were satisfied with presenting counter-evidence represented by new religious movements and fundamentalism. What was most awaited was a comprehensive alternative theory. The situation shows little evidence of change in the 1990s. Although there are two contending new trends, namely, rational choice theory and post-colonial cultural theory, neither of them has succeeded in forming a theory of secularization both innovative and compelling. After surveying these recent discussions, this paper attempts to present a new theory by rehabilitating one of the most controversial components of secularization theory : the rise of unbelief. Employing some general theories of modernization, I reinterpret \"unbelief\" as an outcome of a certain irreversible change in modernization. From another perspective, I propose a relationalistic approach as opposed to an atomistic approach, which underlies \"differentiation\" theory, the best accepted part of secularization theory. The atomistic approach is also related to the dualism of \"the sacred\" and \"the profane\" as quantitative categories, which has caused scholars to overlook qualitative-systematic changes in modern religious phenomena.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_4_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "67155", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "FUJIWARA, Satoko"}]}]}, "item_4_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.15083/00030600", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_4_publisher_20": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "東京大学文学部宗教学研究室"}]}, "item_4_source_id_8": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "02896400", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_4_subject_15": {"attribute_name": "日本十進分類法", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "160", "subitem_subject_scheme": "NDC"}]}, "item_4_text_21": {"attribute_name": "出版者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo"}]}, "item_4_text_34": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Departmental Bulletin Paper"}]}, "item_4_text_4": {"attribute_name": "著者所属", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "日本学術振興会"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "藤原, 聖子"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "67154", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-06-12"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "rel01503.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.7 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1700000.0, "url": {"label": "rel01503.pdf", "url": "https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/30609/files/rel01503.pdf"}, "version_id": "cf060762-f020-4381-a9a6-8a833b8e1501"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "90年代の世俗化論", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "90年代の世俗化論"}]}, "item_type_id": "4", "owner": "1", "path": ["4196", "4195"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.15083/00030600", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2011-10-13"}, "publish_date": "2011-10-13", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "30609", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["90年代の世俗化論"], "weko_shared_id": null}
90年代の世俗化論
https://doi.org/10.15083/00030600
https://doi.org/10.15083/0003060044f9a948-3167-412b-86a5-f52edf505280
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
rel01503.pdf (1.7 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2011-10-13 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 90年代の世俗化論 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15083/00030600 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | Secularization Theory in the 1990s : Dead-ends and Possibilities | |||||
著者 |
藤原, 聖子
× 藤原, 聖子 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子 | 67155 | |||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
姓名 | FUJIWARA, Satoko | |||||
著者所属 | ||||||
著者所属 | 日本学術振興会 | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | In the 1980s many scholars of religion admitted that the debate over secularization had come in an impasse. By that time the secularization thesis had generated a multitude of criticisms, but most critics were satisfied with presenting counter-evidence represented by new religious movements and fundamentalism. What was most awaited was a comprehensive alternative theory. The situation shows little evidence of change in the 1990s. Although there are two contending new trends, namely, rational choice theory and post-colonial cultural theory, neither of them has succeeded in forming a theory of secularization both innovative and compelling. After surveying these recent discussions, this paper attempts to present a new theory by rehabilitating one of the most controversial components of secularization theory : the rise of unbelief. Employing some general theories of modernization, I reinterpret "unbelief" as an outcome of a certain irreversible change in modernization. From another perspective, I propose a relationalistic approach as opposed to an atomistic approach, which underlies "differentiation" theory, the best accepted part of secularization theory. The atomistic approach is also related to the dualism of "the sacred" and "the profane" as quantitative categories, which has caused scholars to overlook qualitative-systematic changes in modern religious phenomena. | |||||
書誌情報 |
東京大学宗教学年報 巻 15, p. 27-43, 発行日 1998-03-31 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 02896400 | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題 | 160 | |||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 東京大学文学部宗教学研究室 | |||||
出版者別名 | ||||||
Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo |