WEKO3
アイテム
「鏡」と「擁護」 : オウム真理教事件によって宗教学はいかに変わったか
https://doi.org/10.15083/00030619
https://doi.org/10.15083/000306196c26d61e-fd6a-4045-a80a-ccf35c8784db
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
rel01302.pdf (1.6 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2011-10-13 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 「鏡」と「擁護」 : オウム真理教事件によって宗教学はいかに変わったか | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00030619 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Mirror and Defense : The Impact of Aum Shinrikyo's Terrorism Upon the Study of Religion in Japan | |||||
| 著者 |
藤原, 聖子
× 藤原, 聖子 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 67193 | |||||
| 姓名 | FUJIWARA, Satoko | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | 東京大学大学院博士課程 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The terrorism of Aum Shinrikyo has shaken the idea of academic "objectivity" in the study of religion. A few scholars were severely criticized by the public for their sympathetic comments on the cult. Analyzing discussions on the cult, this paper addresses : (1) how scholars investigated the cult prior to the act of terrorism ; (2) how their approaches have changed since the event ; (3) how these changes will affect the future study of religion. Scholars of religion have frequently employed a method of "cultural critique," that is, to question the self-evident worldview (value-system, etc.) of the public by representing the unique worldview of a religious group. Those labeled as pro-Aum scholars never actually defended the cult, but only attempted this sort of criticism, which is a popular approach in the current study of new religious movements. Since last spring, however, many scholars have changed their approaches (a few even denied the overall validity of cultural critique). Some attacked Aum in light of the naive dichotomy of true/false religion; and others resurrected the logic used in the previouslydismissed deprivation theory in order to explain the social causes of Aum's terrorism. Such scholars criticized the religious worldview of the cult as the force motivating terrorism, while interpreting the worldview in an apparently agenda-oriented manner. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
東京大学宗教学年報 巻 13, p. 17-31, 発行日 1996-03-30 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02896400 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 160 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学文学部宗教学研究室 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| Department of Religious Studies. The University of Tokyo | ||||||
