ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. 東京大学大学院教育学研究科紀要
  4. 44
  1. 119 教育学研究科・教育学部
  2. 東京大学大学院教育学研究科紀要
  3. 44

教育政策が全国に波及するのはなぜか : 業者テスト問題への対処を事例として

https://doi.org/10.15083/00031397
https://doi.org/10.15083/00031397
9214a1e4-b0e2-42be-ac3c-51ad8b7e2e7a
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
KJ00004682975.pdf KJ00004682975.pdf (1.0 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2008-10-02
タイトル
タイトル 教育政策が全国に波及するのはなぜか : 業者テスト問題への対処を事例として
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15083/00031397
ID登録タイプ JaLC
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Why Some Educational Policies Diffuse to the Whole Country? : A Case Study of the Problems of Commercially Produced Tests
著者 中澤, 渉

× 中澤, 渉

WEKO 123293

中澤, 渉

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 123294
姓名 Nakazawa, Wataru
著者所属
著者所属 東京大学大学院教育学研究科比較教育社会学コース
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The purpose of this paper is to explain why some polices are implemented regardless of short of support, and why some policies are not implemented although lots of people hope to do so. To make this clear, I examine the problem of commercially produced tests. The reason I take this topic is that I can easily compare three similar cases because the former two cases were not resolved but the latter case was resolved. Therefore we can understand the differences between the successful and the unsuccessful clearly as we controlled the case. Excessive competition for the entrance examination had been one of the major topics at educational field in Japan for a long time. To pass the exam, students go to cram school, so-called juku, and take commercially produced tests several times at their own school eagerly. In the opinion of the bureaucrats at the Ministry of Education, these situations promoted excessive competition. Then they tried to stop using them at schools in 1976 and 1983, however, they failed. Finally they succeeded to remove these tests at school in 1993. What is the difference? At the last case, minister of education and executive played an important role. They used mass communication cleverly. They appealed to public opinion about the unfairness of entrance exam by commercially produced tests. The image of using commercially produced tests became worse and the actors around the schools and educational fields wanted to avoid criticized for using them. Although the Ministry of Education didn't have legal force to remove them at school, they were removed. There leaves one important problem. The government decided to take public opinion the highest priority. Needless to say, it is very important. However this public opinion leaves ambiguous and idealistic, and nobody knows how many people believe and agree with it. Furthermore, the Ministry of Education didn't follow up this problem after removal of commercially produced tests and it ignored the teachers'opinion. After 1990s, the Ministry of Education tends to give public image or public opinion priority over teachers'opinion. The teachers who work at school are thrown into confusion. We have to find another way to implement the policy considering both the public and teachers.
書誌情報 東京大学大学院教育学研究科紀要

巻 44, p. 149-157, 発行日 2005-03-10
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 13421050
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10516641
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 370
出版者
出版者 東京大学大学院教育学研究科
出版者別名
The Graduate School of Education, University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 12:11:36.226020
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3