ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 114 人文社会系研究科・文学部
  2. 06 インド哲学仏教学
  3. インド哲学仏教学研究
  4. 20
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. インド哲学仏教学研究
  4. 20

連続性と非連続性 : 呂澂の中国大乗佛教批判について

https://doi.org/10.15083/00036975
https://doi.org/10.15083/00036975
485b30a6-4e26-495f-853b-55fedb0868f0
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ib020007.pdf ib020007.pdf (1.5 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2013-09-24
タイトル
タイトル 連続性と非連続性 : 呂澂の中国大乗佛教批判について
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15083/00036975
ID登録タイプ JaLC
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Continuity and Discontinuity : Lü Cheng’s Criticism of Chinese Mahāyāna Buddhism
著者 張, 文良

× 張, 文良

WEKO 87781

張, 文良

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 87782
姓名 Zhang, Wenliang
著者所属
著者所属 中国人民大学佛教と宗教理論研究所
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 According to Lü Cheng, the Consciousness-Only or Yogācāra School of Indian Buddhism claims that the essence of all sentient beings is “tathatā,” which is lack of cognitive ability, and therefore is a theory of what he calls“Primal Purity.” On the other hand, he claims that Chinese Buddhist philosophers believe that the nature of all sentient beings is pure and intelligent, by their theory of “Original Bodhi.” With these contrasting, Lü Cheng claims that there is a radical rupture between Chinese Buddhism and Indian Buddhism, and he regards Indian Buddhism as orthodox, Chinese Buddhism is therefore “pseudo-Buddhism.” Lü Cheng’s criticism of Chinese Mahāyāna Buddhism points out a difference between Chinese and Indian Buddhist theories, which may be valuable for understanding Chinese Buddhism. However, in contrast to Lü’s analysis, Buddha-nature and tathāgata-garbha theory are both found in Indian Buddhism originally, and in fact are both the source of the theory of “Original Bodhi” found in Chinese Buddhism. Furthermore, there is the tradition of “Original Bodhi” and “Primal Purity” in Chinese Buddhism as well, the latter is represented by the thought of Consciousness-only (weishi zong 唯識宗) school in Chinese Buddhism. Therefore, in contrast to Lü’s view, there is in fact both continuity and discontinuity between Chinese and Indian Buddhism, and Lü Cheng’s chracterization of Chinese Buddhism as “Original Bodhi” cannot be considered complete. Altogether, as for Lü Cheng’s Buddhist research methodology, he is unsatisfied with the current objective Buddhist research, and tries to put a value judgment on Buddhist thought from his standpoint of the Consciousness-Only or Yogācāra School of Indian Buddhism, criticizing what he considered “pseudo-buddhism.” With regard to his research method, further discussion is required.
書誌情報 インド哲学仏教学研究

巻 20, p. 95-106, 発行日 2013-03-31
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 09197907
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10419736
出版者
出版者 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室
出版者別名
Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 11:27:08.647121
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3