WEKO3
アイテム
BrhatīおよびNyāyamañjarīに見られるパーニニ文法学批判
https://doi.org/10.15083/00036988
https://doi.org/10.15083/000369880bd4efa7-d50c-472f-9fca-7e6856b50f33
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ib018004.pdf (811.0 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2011-06-30 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | BrhatīおよびNyāyamañjarīに見られるパーニニ文法学批判 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00036988 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Some critical remarks about Pāṇinian grammar in the Brhatī and the Nyāyamañjarī | |||||
| 著者 |
友成, 有紀
× 友成, 有紀 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 87807 | |||||
| 姓名 | TOMONARI, Yūki | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | 東京大学大学院 | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | 日本学術振興会特別研究員DC | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | It has already been quite well known, that in the system of Pāṇinian grammar(pāṇinīyavyākaraṇa), technical terms, or sañjñās such as dhātu, prātipadika, each kārakas, etc. play a very important role. They enabled ancient grammarians, not only who belongs to the tradition of Pāṇinian grammar, but also to the tradition of other grammar, to encode the fruits of their linguistic observation into a more condensed form of information known with the name of sūtra. sūtras must be pithy enough to describe/prescribe the language in scope, and sañjñās in co-operation with some other techniques can divide the linguistic units and linguistic notions into suitable sets. For the reason of its importance, whether each of all the sañjñās works well or not had been discussed repeatedly and repeatedly by the grammarians, and very interestingly, also by the famous Indian thinkers, such as Prabhākara Miśra (ca. 700) and Jayanta Bhaṭṭa (9c). Some critical remarks about sañjñā system of Pāṇinian grammar, appear in the Prabhākara's Brhatī (B) and Jayanta's Nyāyamañjarī (NM), though have not been studied enough.// The purpose of this paper is to perform following two attempts: (1) To examine whether the concerning part of NM is parallel to that of B or not by comparing these arguments. (2) To examine the contents of these two text with other older treatises of Pāṇinian grammarians, i.e. Kātyāyana's Vārttika (V), Patañjali's Mahābhāṣya (MBh), and Bhartrhari's Vākyapadīya.// As a result of these two attempts above, I got following three conclusive ideas: (1) The arguments appear in B and NM show a certain degree of similarity both in the text and its content, although there exsist several differences in detail. (2) Most part of the critical remarks we meet in B and NM are already appeared in V, and argued in MBh. But the argument concerning with the finite verb form of the root gaṇḍati does not follow the older example. (3) Cakradhara, the author of a commentary on NM (Nyāyamañjarīgranthibhaṅga) regards at least one phrase, “ghaṭambhūyata iti ca” as a parallel text to B. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
インド哲学仏教学研究 巻 18, p. 39-54, 発行日 2011-03-31 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09197907 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10419736 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 126 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo | ||||||
