WEKO3
アイテム
縁起支解釈の展開 : 上座部大寺派の三世両重因果説
https://doi.org/10.15083/00037029
https://doi.org/10.15083/000370292d8cfc4d-02b4-4a4d-9010-38910cdb8731
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
ib010002.pdf (1.1 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2011-06-30 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 縁起支解釈の展開 : 上座部大寺派の三世両重因果説 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15083/00037029 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | Changes in the Interpretation of the Paţiccasamuppādańgas : On the interpretation of Paţiccasamuppāda theory in the Mahāvihāra Theravāda tradition | |||||
著者 |
馬場, 紀寿
× 馬場, 紀寿 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
識別子 | 136129 | |||||
姓名 | Baba, Norihisa | |||||
著者所属 | ||||||
値 | 東京大学大学院 | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | The Interpretation of the Paţiccasamuppādangas in the Mahāvihāra Theravāda tradition changed in the order of the ""Vibhasigasutta"", Vibhańga, VIsuddhimagga and the commentaries on the Vinaya and the four Nikāyas. In this paper, I examine the process of change in these different interpretations. (1) The ""Vibhańgasutta"" (Samyuttanikāyu Nidānavagga2) is the only sutta in the four Nikāyas that describes paţiccasamuppāda as having twelve ańgas and defines all twelve paţiccasamuppādańgas. (2) The ""Suttantabhājaniya"" section of the ""Paccayākāravibhańga"" chapter in the Vibhańga follows almost the same definitions of the paţiccasamuppādańgas as are found in the ""Vibhańgasutta"", but changes the definitions of sańkhārā, nāma, and bhava. ""Vibhańgasutta"" → Vibhańga (a) sańkhārā : kāya-, vacī-, mano-sańkhāra → puñña-, apuñña-, āneñja-, kāya-, vacī-, mano-(abhi)sańkhāra (b) nāma : v edanā, sañña, cetanā, phassa, manasikāra → sañña-, sańkhāra-, viññāna-kkhandha (As a result of this change, viññāna and nāmarūpa came to mean pañcakkhandha) (c) bhava : kāma-, rūpa-, arūpa-bhava. → kamma-, uppatti-bhava These changes made both ""sańkhārā ⇒ viññāna・nāmarūpa"" and ""bhava ⇒ jāti"" common causation as follows. (a) sańkhārā ⇒ viññāna → nāmarūpa = puñña-, apuñña-, āneñja-abhisańkhāra ⇒ khandhā kāya-, vaci-, mano-sańkhārā (b) bhava ⇒ jāti = kamma-bhava (including puñña-, apuñña-, āneñja-abhisańkhāra) ⇒ khandhā uppatti-bhava ※jāti is defined as ""khandhānam pātubhāvo"" (the appearance of khandhā) in the Vibhanga. But in this text the standpoints of ""kayia-, vaci-, mano-sańkhārā"" and ""uppatti-bhavia"" are not yet clear. (3) The Visuddhimagga basically follows the same definition of the paţiccasamuppādańgas as found in the Vibhańga rather than those of the ""Vibhańgasutta"". Moreover, the Visuddhimagga interpretes the six sańkhāras as three sańkhāras, and restricts bhava as being the cause of jāti to only kammabhava. (a) sańkhārā ⇒ viññāna → nāmarūpa = puñña-, apuñña-, āneñja-abhisańkhāra ⇒ khandhā (b) bhava ⇒ jāti = kamma-bhava (including puñña-, apuñña-, āneñja-abhisańkhāra) ⇒ khandhā Therefore, it is clear those the Vrsuddhimagga interpretes both ""sańkhārā"" ⇒ viññāna→nāmarūpa"" and ""bhava ⇒ jāti"" as ""kamma (action) ⇒ rebirth"". With these interpretations, Paţiccasamuppāda theory came to explain the causation of the past, present, and future. (4) The commentary on the Vinaya (Samantapāsādikā) and the commentaries on the four Nikāyas (Sumańgalavilāsinī, Papañcasūdanī, Sāratthappakāsinī, Manorathapūranī) do not explain paţiccasamuppāda in detail and advise readers to study it by reading the Visuddhimagga. Thus, the Visuddhimagga represents the final stage in the interpretation of paţiccasamuppāda theory. | |||||
書誌情報 |
インド哲学仏教学研究 巻 10, p. 17-31, 発行日 2003-03-20 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 09197907 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN10419736 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
主題 | 126 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室 | |||||
出版者別名 | ||||||
値 | Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo |