ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 114 人文社会系研究科・文学部
  2. 06 インド哲学仏教学
  3. インド哲学仏教学研究
  4. 6
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. インド哲学仏教学研究
  4. 6

『大集経』に見られるanabhilāpyaの用例と『菩薩地』の思想形成との関連について

https://doi.org/10.15083/00037048
https://doi.org/10.15083/00037048
4b5ef963-0712-4005-a147-d115dfedd291
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ib006003.pdf ib006003.pdf (1.2 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2011-06-30
タイトル
タイトル 『大集経』に見られるanabhilāpyaの用例と『菩薩地』の思想形成との関連について
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15083/00037048
ID登録タイプ JaLC
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Anabhilāpya in the Mahāsamnipātasūtra and nirabhilāpya in the Bodhisattvabhūmi
著者 高橋, 晃一

× 高橋, 晃一

WEKO 136165

高橋, 晃一

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 136166
姓名 Takahashi, Koichi
著者所属
著者所属 東京大学大学院
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The aim of this paper is to consider the theoretical relationship between the Mahāsamnipātasūtra and the Bodhisattvabhūmi (BBh) that is suggested by the term an-/nir-abhilāpya, which plays in both texts as important a role as any other term and can be regarded as having been used as a special term in arguing their main ideas. Modern scholars have generally assumed that the theories of the BBh developed under the influence of the Cūļasuññatasutta solely on the basis of an alleged quotation from this sutra. But the passage in question is so commonly known in Buddhist literature that we cannot identify with any certainty the particular source from which the BBh actually quoted it. What makes us more skeptical of the direct influence of the latter on the former is the fact that the Cūļasuññatasutta lacks the term nimbhilāpya, without which the main ideas of the BBh cannot be formutalted. Some scholars refer to the influence of the Prajñāpāramrtāsūtra on the BBh, but this argument seemes not to be supported by any actual investigation and does not go beyond general impressions. It must be noted that the author of the Bodhisattvabhūmivyākhyā, a commentary on the BBh, expressly states that the sutras cited in the BBh are ""the Akşayamatinirdcśa and the like,"" and the commentator regards the BBh as having been produced under the influence of the sutras which belong to the Mahāsamnipāta group. Taking the fact into consideration that some of the Mabāsamnipātasūtmas use the term an-/nir-abhilāpya when discussing one of their main subjects, it seems very plausible that the Mahāsamnipāta and BBh share a theoretical background. In order to investigate the oldest theories of the Mahāsamnipāta, the present paper takes up three particular sutras, the Akśayamatmirdesśa, Ratnadārikāsūtra and Dhāraņīśvararājasūtra, all of which are the oldest Chinese translations by Dharmarakśa among the group, and examines the usage of the term anabhilāpya by comparing it with nirabhilāpya in the BBh. Two points are made in conclusion: 1)We find the oldest example of nirabhilāpya in the Akşayamatinirdeśa, where it means that ""the Buddha's teachings are not to be expressed in any words,"" and this is different from its meaning in the BBh, where it implies ""there exists something inexpressible."" 2)There are some cases attested to in the Chinese versions by Dharmarakşa which suggest that the word anupalambha used in an earlier stage was later changed to anabhilāpya. It is remarkable that, judging from the age of the Chinese translations (late 3 CE to early 4 CE), this alternation seems to have occurred almost at the same time when the BBh was compiled, and in addition the same change in wording took place in the Prajñapāramnitāsūtra at almost the same time.
書誌情報 インド哲学仏教学研究

巻 6, p. 31-45, 発行日 1999-03-20
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 09197907
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10419736
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 126
出版者
出版者 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室
出版者別名
Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 11:29:08.135661
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3