WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "dd8fac8f-305a-4ce8-9dc3-a57d518eaa51"}, "_deposit": {"id": "37076", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "37076"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00037076", "sets": ["5775", "5774"]}, "item_4_alternative_title_1": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "The Mahāņirvānatantra\u0027s view of varņas"}]}, "item_4_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1994-09-30", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "133", "bibliographicPageStart": "119", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "2", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "インド哲学仏教学研究"}]}]}, "item_4_description_13": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "application/pdf", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_4_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "To what extent and in what way the Dharmaśāstric traditions have been retained in the Hindu Tantric literature or replaced with new Tantric ideas such as the concept of equality of all varņas (classes, castes) and of men and women as well as in the kali age, are questions about which not much has been resolved until now. so that our general understanding of the problems should be deepened through detailed examinations of relevant materials. The present paper makes an attempt to find a concrete answer with respect to the Mahānirvāņatantra (= Mnt), one of the texts considered to belong to the Left-hand Śākta (Vāmācāraśākta), and presumably written in the late eighteenth century, by exploring its view of varņas. First of all, it must be noted that in addition to the traditional four - that is, brāhmaņa, kşatriya, vaişya and śūdra - the Mnt acknowledges the fifth varņa called sāmānya for the kali age when humanity is assumed to have been corrupted. Although we are not quite certain what this sāmānya precisely means, there seem to be good reasons to accept S. J. Voodroffe\u0027s observation that it is the name for the class of people who are born as a result of intermarriage between different varņas and have been excluded from the varņa system by the traditional Dharmaśāstras as represented by the Nanusmŗti (= Manu). It is also worth noting in this connection that some regulations, such as the one concerning how long a certain kind of impurity will continue to attach to a person, treat the sāmānya on equal terms with the śūdra, seeing no serious distinction such as is found in the Manu among the people within and outside the traditional framework of four varņas. Thus the Nnt is obviously opposed to the Dharmaśāstras in that the Tantric text, at least insofar as the kali age is concerned, accepts the legality of intermarriage, which would evidently violate the old concept of the varņa system. Furthermore, the Mnt completely denies any discrimination among varņas in the practice of kuladharmas, the only possible means of attaining mokşa (deliverance) in the kali age. The Mnt\u0027s idea that all human beings are eligible for kuladharmas stands in clear contrast with the Manu\u0027s limitation of eligibility for dharmas to the upper three varņas. The Not does not, however, deny the existence of the varņa system itself. For all the absoluteness of kuladharmas in the kali age, the Mnt, at the same time, preaches the observance of the discrimination among varņas with reference to many occasions in daily life. In other words, two kinds of dharmas coexist in the Hat: kuladharmas and the traditional dharmas which the Manu limits to the upper three varņas. Then which dharmas have priority in the Mnt? We can answer this question by saying that knladharmas are praised as the absolute means of attaining mokşa, and that the traditional dharmas are prescribed for the majority of daily and secular life including inheritance, although śaiva marriage, in which discrimination among varņas is strictly prohibited, is allowed.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_4_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "136200", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "Watanabe, Hiroki"}]}]}, "item_4_publisher_20": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "東京大学文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室"}]}, "item_4_source_id_10": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN10419736", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_4_source_id_8": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "09197907", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_4_subject_15": {"attribute_name": "日本十進分類法", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "126", "subitem_subject_scheme": "NDC"}]}, "item_4_text_21": {"attribute_name": "出版者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Faculty of Letters, University of Tokyo"}]}, "item_4_text_34": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Departmental Bulletin Paper"}]}, "item_4_text_4": {"attribute_name": "著者所属", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "東京大学大学院"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "渡辺, 浩希"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "136199", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-06-27"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "ib002008.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "859.0 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 859000.0, "url": {"label": "ib002008.pdf", "url": "https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/37076/files/ib002008.pdf"}, "version_id": "c4880c70-f1d6-440b-ac98-add6f5c70183"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Mahānirvāņatantraのvarņa観", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Mahānirvāņatantraのvarņa観"}]}, "item_type_id": "4", "owner": "1", "path": ["5775", "5774"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2261/6511", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2011-06-30"}, "publish_date": "2011-06-30", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "37076", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Mahānirvāņatantraのvarņa観"], "weko_shared_id": null}
Mahānirvāņatantraのvarņa観
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/6511
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/6511b63cb0f5-2ea7-4502-a08f-fb82566bb36f
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
ib002008.pdf (859.0 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2011-06-30 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Mahānirvāņatantraのvarņa観 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | The Mahāņirvānatantra's view of varņas | |||||
著者 |
渡辺, 浩希
× 渡辺, 浩希 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子 | 136200 | |||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
姓名 | Watanabe, Hiroki | |||||
著者所属 | ||||||
著者所属 | 東京大学大学院 | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | To what extent and in what way the Dharmaśāstric traditions have been retained in the Hindu Tantric literature or replaced with new Tantric ideas such as the concept of equality of all varņas (classes, castes) and of men and women as well as in the kali age, are questions about which not much has been resolved until now. so that our general understanding of the problems should be deepened through detailed examinations of relevant materials. The present paper makes an attempt to find a concrete answer with respect to the Mahānirvāņatantra (= Mnt), one of the texts considered to belong to the Left-hand Śākta (Vāmācāraśākta), and presumably written in the late eighteenth century, by exploring its view of varņas. First of all, it must be noted that in addition to the traditional four - that is, brāhmaņa, kşatriya, vaişya and śūdra - the Mnt acknowledges the fifth varņa called sāmānya for the kali age when humanity is assumed to have been corrupted. Although we are not quite certain what this sāmānya precisely means, there seem to be good reasons to accept S. J. Voodroffe's observation that it is the name for the class of people who are born as a result of intermarriage between different varņas and have been excluded from the varņa system by the traditional Dharmaśāstras as represented by the Nanusmŗti (= Manu). It is also worth noting in this connection that some regulations, such as the one concerning how long a certain kind of impurity will continue to attach to a person, treat the sāmānya on equal terms with the śūdra, seeing no serious distinction such as is found in the Manu among the people within and outside the traditional framework of four varņas. Thus the Nnt is obviously opposed to the Dharmaśāstras in that the Tantric text, at least insofar as the kali age is concerned, accepts the legality of intermarriage, which would evidently violate the old concept of the varņa system. Furthermore, the Mnt completely denies any discrimination among varņas in the practice of kuladharmas, the only possible means of attaining mokşa (deliverance) in the kali age. The Mnt's idea that all human beings are eligible for kuladharmas stands in clear contrast with the Manu's limitation of eligibility for dharmas to the upper three varņas. The Not does not, however, deny the existence of the varņa system itself. For all the absoluteness of kuladharmas in the kali age, the Mnt, at the same time, preaches the observance of the discrimination among varņas with reference to many occasions in daily life. In other words, two kinds of dharmas coexist in the Hat: kuladharmas and the traditional dharmas which the Manu limits to the upper three varņas. Then which dharmas have priority in the Mnt? We can answer this question by saying that knladharmas are praised as the absolute means of attaining mokşa, and that the traditional dharmas are prescribed for the majority of daily and secular life including inheritance, although śaiva marriage, in which discrimination among varņas is strictly prohibited, is allowed. | |||||
書誌情報 |
インド哲学仏教学研究 巻 2, p. 119-133, 発行日 1994-09-30 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 09197907 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN10419736 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題 | 126 | |||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 東京大学文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室 | |||||
出版者別名 | ||||||
Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Faculty of Letters, University of Tokyo |