ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 114 人文社会系研究科・文学部
  2. 06 インド哲学仏教学
  3. インド哲学仏教学研究
  4. 1
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. インド哲学仏教学研究
  4. 1

無自性性論証における能遍の無知覚因の機能について

http://hdl.handle.net/2261/6507
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/6507
c2af334b-dd10-4d04-9762-c32f691d9135
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ib001005.pdf ib001005.pdf (1.3 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2011-06-30
タイトル
タイトル 無自性性論証における能遍の無知覚因の機能について
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Functions of ""vyāpakānupalabdhi-hetu"" in Kamalaśīla's demonstration of nihsvabhāvatā
著者 計良, 龍成

× 計良, 龍成

WEKO 136207

計良, 龍成

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 136208
姓名 Keira, Ryusei
著者所属
著者所属 東京大学大学院
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Kamalaśīla(A.D. 740-795) systematized the nihsvabhāva-siddhi into the five syllogisms(prayogas). His aim in terms of the five syllogisms was to point out a contradict ion(bādhā) in the svabhāva, which is supposed to be not conventional things but the ultimate reality(paramārtha) seen by others. Kamalaśīla's nihsva-bhāvasiddhi, with such an aim, has three logical characteristics as follows. I. Bādhaka-pramāņa, which was devised by Dharmakīrti, is introduced into the nihsvabhāva-siddhi. II. Vyāpakānupalabdhi is adopted as a reason into the five syllogisms, except for the fourth. III. Unreal things such as māyā, ākāśotpala, etc., are adopted as sapakşa. In this article I refer to the second characteristic, and the functions of vyāpakānupalabdhi-hetu(VH) are considered from two viewpoints: the fallacy of asiddha-hetu and the influence of VH on the negation as prasajya-pratişedha. As a result. we reach the following four conclusions: 1. By making the best use of the characteristic of VH, Kamalaśīla avoids the fallacy of asiddha-hetu, especially that of ubhayāsiddha. He insists that ekānekaviyoga-hetu is ubhayasiddha, even if a locus(pakşa) is invisible(parokşa), by reason of the necessary implication(sāmarthya). Kamalaśīla breaks a rule of drśyānupalabdhi. 2. Kamalaśīla is not a svabhāvānupalabdhivādin but a vyāpakānupalabdhivādin like Dharmottara. Pakşadharmatva of VH is not determined by svabhāvānupalabdhi or by the negation as paryudāsa. It is confirmed by pratyakşa without the cause of an optical illusion(bhranti), or by anumāna with the intention of deciding the truth of things. 3. The use of prasajya-pratişedha is restricted by VH not to kriyā-pratişedha but to guņa-pratişedha as vyavaccheda-mātra. That is the reason Kamalaśīla was able to avoid the fallacy of āśrayāsiddha. For he thought that an unreal entity can be a locus, when only the elimination(vyavaccheda-mātra) of a property (dharma) supposed by others is proved. 4. The syllogisms composed by Kamalaśīla for the nihsvabhāva-siddhi take the form of svatantra-anumāna. But they are prasangas in substance, since objects of negation(pratişedhyas) of the ultimate reality in VH and an object of proof(sādhya) are things acknowledged only by others(parasiddha).
書誌情報 インド哲学仏教学研究

巻 1, p. 51-67, 発行日 1993-09-20
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 09197907
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10419736
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 126
出版者
出版者 東京大学文学部印度哲学研究室
出版者別名
Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Faculty of Letters, University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 21:13:00.591734
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3