WEKO3
アイテム
無自性性論証における能遍の無知覚因の機能について
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/6507
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/6507c2af334b-dd10-4d04-9762-c32f691d9135
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ib001005.pdf (1.3 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2011-06-30 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 無自性性論証における能遍の無知覚因の機能について | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Functions of ""vyāpakānupalabdhi-hetu"" in Kamalaśīla's demonstration of nihsvabhāvatā | |||||
| 著者 |
計良, 龍成
× 計良, 龍成 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 136208 | |||||
| 姓名 | Keira, Ryusei | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | 東京大学大学院 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Kamalaśīla(A.D. 740-795) systematized the nihsvabhāva-siddhi into the five syllogisms(prayogas). His aim in terms of the five syllogisms was to point out a contradict ion(bādhā) in the svabhāva, which is supposed to be not conventional things but the ultimate reality(paramārtha) seen by others. Kamalaśīla's nihsva-bhāvasiddhi, with such an aim, has three logical characteristics as follows. I. Bādhaka-pramāņa, which was devised by Dharmakīrti, is introduced into the nihsvabhāva-siddhi. II. Vyāpakānupalabdhi is adopted as a reason into the five syllogisms, except for the fourth. III. Unreal things such as māyā, ākāśotpala, etc., are adopted as sapakşa. In this article I refer to the second characteristic, and the functions of vyāpakānupalabdhi-hetu(VH) are considered from two viewpoints: the fallacy of asiddha-hetu and the influence of VH on the negation as prasajya-pratişedha. As a result. we reach the following four conclusions: 1. By making the best use of the characteristic of VH, Kamalaśīla avoids the fallacy of asiddha-hetu, especially that of ubhayāsiddha. He insists that ekānekaviyoga-hetu is ubhayasiddha, even if a locus(pakşa) is invisible(parokşa), by reason of the necessary implication(sāmarthya). Kamalaśīla breaks a rule of drśyānupalabdhi. 2. Kamalaśīla is not a svabhāvānupalabdhivādin but a vyāpakānupalabdhivādin like Dharmottara. Pakşadharmatva of VH is not determined by svabhāvānupalabdhi or by the negation as paryudāsa. It is confirmed by pratyakşa without the cause of an optical illusion(bhranti), or by anumāna with the intention of deciding the truth of things. 3. The use of prasajya-pratişedha is restricted by VH not to kriyā-pratişedha but to guņa-pratişedha as vyavaccheda-mātra. That is the reason Kamalaśīla was able to avoid the fallacy of āśrayāsiddha. For he thought that an unreal entity can be a locus, when only the elimination(vyavaccheda-mātra) of a property (dharma) supposed by others is proved. 4. The syllogisms composed by Kamalaśīla for the nihsvabhāva-siddhi take the form of svatantra-anumāna. But they are prasangas in substance, since objects of negation(pratişedhyas) of the ultimate reality in VH and an object of proof(sādhya) are things acknowledged only by others(parasiddha). | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
インド哲学仏教学研究 巻 1, p. 51-67, 発行日 1993-09-20 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09197907 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10419736 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 126 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学文学部印度哲学研究室 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Faculty of Letters, University of Tokyo | ||||||
