ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 114 人文社会系研究科・文学部
  2. 36 英語英米文学
  3. Linguistic research : working papers in English linguistics
  4. 26
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. Linguistic research : working papers in English linguistics
  4. 26

Move versus Non-Move: Minimalist Analysis of Long-Distance Reflexives and Logophoric Pronouns

https://doi.org/10.15083/00039153
https://doi.org/10.15083/00039153
afcb67b4-f48a-4d00-b73c-4ba184bd9c9a
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
lr026004.pdf lr026004.pdf (430.3 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2013-06-11
タイトル
タイトル Move versus Non-Move: Minimalist Analysis of Long-Distance Reflexives and Logophoric Pronouns
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 long-distance reflexives
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 logophoric pronouns
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 de se interpretations
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 the Blocking Effect
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 left periphery
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15083/00039153
ID登録タイプ JaLC
著者 Ito, Yuki

× Ito, Yuki

WEKO 91401

Ito, Yuki

Search repository
著者所属
著者所属 University of Tokyo
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This paper focuses on long-distance reflexives (LDRs) and logophoric pronouns (LOGs), which share the property of forcing de se interpretations, and argues that LDRs involve movement in Narrow Syntax while LOGs are mediated by unselective binding in the interpretive (Σ) component. Specifically, I show that sentences containing LDRs, unlike those with LOGs, exhibit certain gaps in their interpretive possibilities, and propose that this difference in interpretive possibilities between LDRs and LOGs results from an island effect (via defective intervention) caused by the overt movement involved in LDRs. The paper proposes analyzing LDRs as instances of resumption and claims that this analysis of LDRs as resumption derives Pica’s (1987) generalization regarding the morphological simplicity of LDRs. Based on the Blocking Effect in Chinsese and the indicative/subjunctive opposition in Icelandic and Italian, it is further argued that the movement involved in LDRs exhibits successive cyclicity and that the target of the movement is a relatively low position in the articulated structure of the left periphery. The analysis of LDRs and LOGs in this paper leads to the conclusion that the mechanism of subject control is not reduced either to that of LDRs or to that of LOGs, contra Chierchia (1989).
書誌情報 Linguistic research : working papers in English linguistics

巻 26, p. 67-104, 発行日 2010-09
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA10462609
出版者
出版者 Tokyo University English Linguistics Association
出版者別名
東京大学英語学研究会
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 14:31:39.825647
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3