WEKO3
アイテム
Move versus Non-Move: Minimalist Analysis of Long-Distance Reflexives and Logophoric Pronouns
https://doi.org/10.15083/00039153
https://doi.org/10.15083/00039153afcb67b4-f48a-4d00-b73c-4ba184bd9c9a
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
lr026004.pdf (430.3 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2013-06-11 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Move versus Non-Move: Minimalist Analysis of Long-Distance Reflexives and Logophoric Pronouns | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | long-distance reflexives | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | logophoric pronouns | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | de se interpretations | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | the Blocking Effect | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | left periphery | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00039153 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者 |
Ito, Yuki
× Ito, Yuki |
|||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 値 | University of Tokyo | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This paper focuses on long-distance reflexives (LDRs) and logophoric pronouns (LOGs), which share the property of forcing de se interpretations, and argues that LDRs involve movement in Narrow Syntax while LOGs are mediated by unselective binding in the interpretive (Σ) component. Specifically, I show that sentences containing LDRs, unlike those with LOGs, exhibit certain gaps in their interpretive possibilities, and propose that this difference in interpretive possibilities between LDRs and LOGs results from an island effect (via defective intervention) caused by the overt movement involved in LDRs. The paper proposes analyzing LDRs as instances of resumption and claims that this analysis of LDRs as resumption derives Pica’s (1987) generalization regarding the morphological simplicity of LDRs. Based on the Blocking Effect in Chinsese and the indicative/subjunctive opposition in Icelandic and Italian, it is further argued that the movement involved in LDRs exhibits successive cyclicity and that the target of the movement is a relatively low position in the articulated structure of the left periphery. The analysis of LDRs and LOGs in this paper leads to the conclusion that the mechanism of subject control is not reduced either to that of LDRs or to that of LOGs, contra Chierchia (1989). | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
Linguistic research : working papers in English linguistics 巻 26, p. 67-104, 発行日 2010-09 |
|||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA10462609 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | Tokyo University English Linguistics Association | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| 値 | 東京大学英語学研究会 | |||||
