ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 114 人文社会系研究科・文学部
  2. 91 死生学研究拠点
  3. 死生学研究
  4. 12
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 40 研究調査報告書
  3. 045 COE報告書

「死者に鞭打つ」ことは可能か : 死者に対する危害に関する一考察

http://hdl.handle.net/2261/37000
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/37000
52ca867f-0059-49d7-aa8d-51f7a3b4c8a8
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
da012014.pdf da012014.pdf (1.2 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2010-08-06
タイトル
タイトル 「死者に鞭打つ」ことは可能か : 死者に対する危害に関する一考察
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Can We Whip the Dead? : A Philosophical Examination of Posthumous Harm.
著者 福間, 聡

× 福間, 聡

WEKO 95222

福間, 聡

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 95223
姓名 Fukuma, Satoshi
著者所属
著者所属 研究拠点形成特任研究員
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 There is a Japanese expression "whipping the dead." This derives from a historical event in China. Wu Zixu, whose father and brothers had been killed by King Ping of Chu, exhumed the dead body of the King from his tomb and whipped it three hundred times as a kind of revenge. In Japan, this expression became an idiom that refers to when we blame and attack the antemonem words and deeds of the deceased. We use this idiom to teach that we have to refrain from blaming the deceased if it diminishes his or her memory; for example, "Because the professor has already died, you should not blame his remarks in his later years. This is because you whip the dead if you blame him." Why should we care about the deceased in this way? Do we harm the dead by blaming them now? Can we harm a person who has already died? Ifwe can, what harm is it ?<改行> To begin with, in order that a person can receive profit or injury from an event, he or she must exist when it happens. That is, if "the Existence Condition" nothing bad can happen to a person unless he or she exists at that time - is valid, no harm will be caused to the dead. However, does not this conclusion contradict our intuition that even the dead can be subjected to the negative effects of our actions ? It seems that we generally think that we should avoid condemning the deceased's antemonem words, deeds, and achievements. Then, does the precept that we should not blame the dead imply that we should not blame a person (though he or she is living) who is presently absent? That is, do we think of it as proper etiquette that we should not blame a person who cannot argue against us? Or, do we think that we should not out of consideration for the bereaved family ?<改行> However, the reason that it is important for the absent living to argue against condemning him or her is that there are real interests that he or she wants to protect. But there are no such interests for the deceased because he or she now is not a subject who can have them. So the reason that it is impossible to rebut blame is begging the question in the case of the deceased if the Existence Condition is valid. Moreover, if the bereaved family and related parties are now non-existent, can we be permitted to deliver any blame on the deceased? If so, do we need not respect the wishes of the deceased who has no relatives at all ? <改行> In order to defend our intuition, there are two ways in which we can insist that people can receive harm and profit from events that happen posthumously. One way is that we can argue that some interests of the deceased can survive his or her death, and their fulfillment being obstmcted harms the antemortem person. The other is that we can argue that, because the will of the deceased does not continue to exist in the mode of interests, he or she cannot undergo "real change" by posthumous events-but can undergo a "Cambridge change (relational change)." <改行> In this article, through examining these two standpoints, I consider whether our (Japanese) intuition that we should not condemn the deceased and that we should respect the living will of the deceased is valid from the perspective of the philosophy of death. Then, in light of these considerations, I make a proposal on some of the issues surrounding organ transplantation in Japanese society. I insist that we cannot harm the deceased, but can wrong him or her.
書誌情報 死生学研究

巻 12, p. 129(148)-149(128), 発行日 2009-10-31
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 18826024
ISBN
識別子タイプ ISBN
関連識別子 9784925210157
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA11838867
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 105
出版者
出版者 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科
出版者
出版者 東京大学グローバルCOEプログラム「死生学の展開と組織化」
出版者別名
Development and Systematization of Death and Life Studies
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 17:34:24.047437
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3