WEKO3
アイテム
Was the Worldview of the Early Imāmiyya Deterministic and Dualistic? : Analysis of Ḥadīth Literature Written During the Minor Occultation
https://doi.org/10.15083/0000051789
https://doi.org/10.15083/0000051789d4f91e42-7331-4c81-be94-26ebe9ffa91a
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
islamsk001003.pdf (768.5 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2019-04-19 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Was the Worldview of the Early Imāmiyya Deterministic and Dualistic? : Analysis of Ḥadīth Literature Written During the Minor Occultation | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15083/0000051789 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
著者 |
HIRANO, Takahiro
× HIRANO, Takahiro |
|||||
著者所属 | ||||||
値 | Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, the University of Tokyo | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | This study verifies the assumption made by researchers that the characteristics of the early Imāmiyya consist of determinism and dualism. As a result, I will demonstrate that some of the early Imāmī scholars ideologically positioned themselves between determinism and free will, and at least for legal matters, their doctrines cannot be characterized by dualism. First, I verify that some books written during the period of the Minor Occultation (874-941) are the earliest ones that we have sufficient access to for review. In this paper, I analyze three ḥadīth literature compiled by al-Barqī, alṢaffār, and al-Kulaynī and three Qur’anic commentaries written by Furāt, ʻAlī b. Ibrāhīm al-Quumī, and al-ʻAyyāshī. Disputes on free will and determinism have been evident in the Muslim community since the Umayyad period. While four of the six literature written during this period criticized the Qadariyya who believe in free will, they did not discuss any critical arguments about determinism. However, two of the literature contend that there is a middle ground between free will and determinism, by criticizing both of these two positions. I insist that there were disputes on determinism and free will among the early Imāmiyya as among the Sunni contemporary scholars. Therefore, we cannot generalize the early Imāmī worldview as deterministic. If we describe Imāmī thought as dualistic, we can also characterize Sunni thought as somewhat dualistic. As the legal classification of Muslims into four groups (a family of imams, Imāmī believers, mukhālif, and nāṢib) demonstrates, early Imāmī worldview about this world was far removed from dualism. I conclude that Imāmī legal doctrines cannot be characterized as dualistic, even if their worldviews about the hereafter are dualistic. |
|||||
言語 | en | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Note | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : イスラム思想研究 巻 1, p. 25-38, 発行日 2019-03-31 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 2434-8732 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA12858495 | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
値 | publisher | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科イスラム学研究室 | |||||
言語 | ja |