ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 132 東洋文化研究所
  2. 東洋文化研究所紀要
  3. 174
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. 東洋文化研究所紀要
  4. 174

『正義のアイデア』にみるセンの経済学 : 帰納法と演繹法

https://doi.org/10.15083/00077041
https://doi.org/10.15083/00077041
9fdaeb6e-5f2c-4847-8363-2004b33dc4f6
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ioc174001.pdf ioc174001.pdf (556.2 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-05-15
タイトル
タイトル 『正義のアイデア』にみるセンの経済学 : 帰納法と演繹法
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15083/00077041
ID登録タイプ JaLC
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Sen’s Economics in The Idea of Justice : Induction vs Deduction
著者 平位, 匡

× 平位, 匡

WEKO 155289

平位, 匡

Search repository
池本, 幸生

× 池本, 幸生

WEKO 155290

池本, 幸生

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 155291
姓名 HIRAI, Tadashi
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 155292
姓名 IKEMOTO, Yukio
著者所属
著者所属 ケンブリッジ大学
著者所属
著者所属 東京大学東洋文化研究所
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 In The Idea of Justice, Amartya Sen started his argument by differentiating his capability approach from the mainstream in terms of structure: comparative vis-à-vis transcendental. He called the mainstream approach of justice as transcendental because it has been trying to construct a theory of justice based on fundamental principles questing for perfection. Sen insists that it is impossible to construct a perfect theory of justice because our world is far from perfection and that what we need is a more practical approach, which can be used to compare feasible options that we actually have and to choose one from among them. What lies behind this strategy is respect for a plurality of values and reasoning in society. In this context, description plays a key role in this approach, given that plural values and reasoning can be reflected only in an inductive manner which requires rich description.
This difference can be applied to his approach in economics. The mainstream economics has been constructing models and theories based on hypothesis such as utility maximization. In this sense the mainstream is “perfect” but not practical as such hypothesis is not realistic. In the field of development economics he uses more practical and realistic approach based on statistics. His main contributions in the field such as the cause of famine and missing women started from examining statistics. His argument always starts from reality and is thus inductive, which is in sharp contrast with the deductive mainstream approach. Sen’s approach can be traced back to the Cambridge tradition, which typically embraces inductive methods of reasoning. The purpose of this article is to examine how Sen’s approach is related to it with a particular focus on the influence of Maurice Dobb. In relation to this, some possible extensions of his approach will be discussed.
書誌情報 東洋文化研究所紀要 = The memoirs of Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia

巻 174, p. 1-32, 発行日 2019-02-28
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 05638089
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00170926
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
出版者
出版者 東京大学東洋文化研究所
出版者別名
Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 11:54:57.117112
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3