WEKO3
アイテム
生まれと国籍 : 国籍の生得権をめぐる規範的検討
https://doi.org/10.15083/00079109
https://doi.org/10.15083/000791096af2b4c2-126f-4c89-a811-7d3160391256
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
vol2901.pdf (788.9 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2020-03-31 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 生まれと国籍 : 国籍の生得権をめぐる規範的検討 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00079109 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Rethinking Birthright Citizenship : A Normative Analysis | |||||
| 著者 |
柴田, 温比古
× 柴田, 温比古 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 160290 | |||||
| 姓名 | SHIBATA, Atsuhiko | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 値 | 東京大学大学院総合文化研究科国際社会科学専攻 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Birthright citizenship has long been taken for granted. Although the existing regime of citizenship has been recently challenged from various angles, birthright citizenship remains a blind spot in such rethinking. However, birthright citizenship situates birth as the primary and natural form of citizenship acquisition. It thus implies that postnatal acquisition of citizenship is an exception and, ultimately, functions as a source of discrimination between native-born citizens and naturalized citizens. Based on this recognition, this article reconsiders birthright citizenship from a normative perspective. The justifi catory arguments for birthright citizenship can be divided into two types: (1) the arguments based on the intrinsic value of birth and (2) those based on its instrumental value. The instrumental arguments vary according to their normative rationale: (a) prevention of statelessness, (b) stability of the intergenerational community, or (c) bestowment in advance. This article shows that none of these arguments is substantive. For the concrete institutional arrangement, historical and social contexts must be carefully taken into account. Nevertheless, the result of the analysis suggests the possibility of alternative regimes, where each individual remains stateless until the establishment of ties to a certain state, under the condition that their basic rights are secured. This conclusion requires radical re-conception and further theoretical investigation into citizenship. |
|||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 一般論文 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
相関社会科学 = Komaba Studies in Society 巻 29, p. 3-17, 発行日 2020-03-01 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09159312 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10181474 | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 値 | publisher | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学大学院総合文化研究科国際社会科学専攻 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| 値 | Department of Advanced Social and International Studies, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo | |||||
