WEKO3
アイテム
研究業績とは何（であるべき）か？
https://doi.org/10.15083/0002000142
https://doi.org/10.15083/000200014283850943-a88a-4c64-a442-06b5e63985ed
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
100_2.pdf (1.3MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2021-05-24 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 研究業績とは何（であるべき）か？ | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | How is (or Should) the Performance of Academic Researchers (be) Evaluated? | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 業績評価 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 定量評価 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 定性評価 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | ライデン声明 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 学際組織 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Evaluation of Research Products | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Quantitative Evaluation | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Qualitatative Evaluation | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Leiden Manifesto | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Interdisciplinarity | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/0002000142 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 著者 |
佐倉, 統
× 佐倉, 統
|
|||||||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 著者所属 | 東京大学大学院情報学環 | |||||||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 著者所属 | 理化学研究所革新知能統合研究センター | |||||||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 著者所属 | Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, the University of Tokyo | |||||||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 著者所属 | RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Research Project (AIP) | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | The philosophy and methods of evaluating outcomes of research activities differ widely across the academic fields. Formerly, these evaluation frameworks were based on each research field scenario, but recently, quantitative measures have become popular and are being applied across various disciplines. The frequently applied measures are, for example, Science Citation Index for articles, Impact Factor for academic journals, and h-index for the individual research. Although these quantitative indices are helpful to visualize the dynamics of the production process of scientific knowledge, they are inappropriate measures for evaluating the “excellence” of individual researchers and academic journals because the variances are too large. In addition, the citation data mainly cover articles published in academic journals; thus, evaluating the achievements in the form of books, such as textbooks and monographs, is difficult. Therefore, applying these indices is inappropriate for researchers who put priorities in publishing studies on specific fields such as humanities. Nevertheless, conspicuous misuse of these quantitative measures has been increasing, and they have been applied as criteria in personnel evaluations, such as hiring and promotion, especially in recent years. / The Leiden Manifesto, published in Nature in 2015, summarizes the problems with quantitative measures and proposes 10 principles on how research achievements should be evaluated. It states that the qualitative approach should take the main role in the evaluation, whereas the quantitative measures should be used as supplementary. Moreover, the evaluation should consider the characteristics of each field. This present study introduces four principles among the 10, which are particularly important for interdisciplinary research and education organizations. Furthermore, it reconfirms the necessity of multidimensional measures in the evaluation of interdisciplinary achievements. / The evaluation of research performance is a dialog between academic and public society. It is not only a reflection of the academic researchers’ desire or the requests from the public. A research evaluation is a communication between different values of both parties, and therefore, difficulties to a certain degree are inevitable. Those who are in the midst of this evaluation process, especially the younger academicians, should not accept only one of the assessment measures, but rather seek a compromise between the two to overcome the underlying issue. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 教員研究論文 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | Faculty Papers | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 情報学研究 : 学環 : 東京大学大学院情報学環紀要 巻 100, p. 1-18, 発行日 2021-03-31 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1880697X | |||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | EISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 21878056 | |||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA12032633 | |||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||
| 値 | publisher | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学大学院情報学環 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
